FACTORS AFFECTING THE USERS’ SENSE OF SECURITY AND TRUST IN INTEGRATING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD TO CLOUD

Factors Affecting the Users’ Sense of Security and Trust in Integrating Electronic Health Record TO CLOUD

 

By

 

Lloyd Enyrebe Johnson

 

Presented to

 

Prof. Steve Page, S-Master of Science, Information System Management (S-MScISM)

University of Salford, Manchester

United Kingdom

 

30th of June 2017

 

PREFACE

I am grateful to God who has made this journey a success. To everyone who have assisted me thus far, I say a big thank you. I wish to acknowledge and sincerely thank my dissertation Supervisor. Prof. Dr. Steve Page For his guidance, patience and constant encouragement. During  my  thesis,  he  was  instrumental  in  inspiring  me  to  work  towards  solving  a well-defined  problem  that  would  result  in  a  publishable  article and paper.  It would not have been possible for me to complete this thesis and graduate without his guidance. My lecturers Dr Radu Negoescu, Mr Alin Stefaniu, Prof. Dennis Crossen, Dr Susan Harwood, Dr. Alistair Benson, Dr Patrick Reid,  the participants who took their time to read and take part in the study. My wife Charlotte Khapwale, Uduak Johnson, Jesse Ryan for their immense guidance, encouragement and support. My brothers and sisters for their prayers and support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE………………………………………………………………………………….. .I

TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………...............II

CHAPTER I.........……………………………………………………………………. …... Error! Bookmark not defined.

1: INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….. …..... 1

           1.0....................................................................... Background of the Problem………………………………………………... 2

           1.1 Research Questions and Objectives………………………………………....... 3

           1.2 Research Questions…………………………………………………….. ……... 4

           1.3 Research Aim/Objective…..……………………………………………......... 5

           1.4 Justfication of the Research………………………………….......…………....            6

               1.5 Research Methodology - Outline..........................………………………….... 7

               1.6 Dissertation Structure……….……………………………………………….. 8         

CHAPTER II.......………………………………................................................................. 9

2: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………………...... 9

             2.0 Introduction....................................................................................................10

          2.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)................................…………………11

          2.2 The Importance of the EHR System..............................................................12

          2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud..............................................................................13

          2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud.......................14

          2.5 Summary........................................................................................................15

CHAPTER III.......………………………………………………………………………..16

3.0: METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................16

3.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................18

3.2 Research Philosophy...............................................................................................19

3.3 Research Strategy....................................................................................................20

3.4 Research Design......................................................................................................21

3.4.1 Questions directed to the expert participants..........................................................22

3.4.2 User Interviewees...................................................................................................23

3.5 Research Administration...........................................................................................24

3.6 Research Ethics.........................................................................................................25

3.7 Chapter Summary......................................................................................................24

CHAPTER IV................................................................................................................25

4.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS..................................................................................25

4.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................26

4.2 Demographics, Healthcare and EHR........................................................................27

4.2.1 Tabled Representation of the Participant’s Place of Residence.............................28

4.2.2 Sampled Participants by Age.................................................................................29

4.3 Accessing Hospitals or Healthcare Services.............................................................30

4.4 The Importance of Medical History in the Provision of Healthcare Services..........31

4.5 Information Required in Healthcare Facilities.........................................................32

4.6 Electronic Information Storage................................................................................33

4.7 Confidentiality in Handling Healthcare Information ..............................................34

4.8 Management of Health Information ........................................................................35

4.9 Digital Medical Records and Respondents’ Knowledge of Cloud Security System.36

4.10 Ethical Concerns......................................................................................................37

       CHAPTER V.................................................................................................................38

       5.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION.........................................................................38

       5.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................39

       5.1.1 Critique of the Adopted Approach.........................................................................40

       5.2 Analysis of the Findings............................................................................................41

       5.3 Overall Conclusion....................................................................................................42

       5.4 Limitations of the Study ...........................................................................................43

       5.5 Opportunities for Further Research...........................................................................44

BIOGRAPHY.......................................................................................................................38

APPENDICS........................................................................................................................39


 

Chapter I - Introduction

1.0 Background Information

            The continuous quality improvement in health care delivery requires the continual improvement of the system. Information management is one of the essential health care components that ensure quality, secure, and efficient delivery of health care services. According to Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013) and Wang, et al. (2016), effective information management plays a critical role in minimizing medical/healthcare risks and errors by facilitating efficiency and quality. In the recent past, the implementation of electronic health record (EHR) has improved storage and management of patient records significantly. It stores and allows easier retrieval of the information thus enhancing efficiency in delivering services (Deshmukh, 2016). The digitization of the EHR has improved data/record-keeping by making it easier and highly convenient for nurses, physicians, specialists, and patients; amongst the many other personnel roles that form part of a healthcare provider. Cloud is more efficient, cost-effective, and has lower scalability of application which makes it attractive to more users. However, the major concern about the technology revolves around the question of security and the privacy of information or data (Lyu, et al., 2016).

            Subashini and Kavitha (2011), points out a growing concern about the safety of the Cloud environment and increasing trust issues among the users. The authors assert that there is a significant reluctance to allow integration of business in the Cloud (Subashini & Kavitha, 2011). Coats and Acharya (2014) support Subashini and Kavitha’s argument that security is a major issue reducing the adoption and use of Cloud computing. Additionally, Roehrs, et al. (2017) state that complications with data privacy and protection among other concerns influence the application of Cloud computing. In the healthcare setting, the application of the EHR to Cloud continues to rise. However, the aforementioned concerns limit its application (Deshmukh, 2016). While this is the case, there is limited literature on the factors that influence the security and trust concerns in integrating EHR to Cloud. This dissertation focuses on offering an articulate study of the EHR incorporation to Cloud and the influence on the delivery of healthcare services. Most importantly, through the application of an efficient research methodology and critical literature review, it studies and outlines the different factors influencing the users’ security and trust concerns in integrating EHR to Cloud.

1.1 Research Question and Objectives

            The EHR offers a patient-centered recording of patient information and allows easier access and retrieval of the information by authorized users. In the recent past, the continued integration of EHR to Cloud promises a more efficient, easier, and low-cost management of the information. According to Deshmukh (2016), the integration of EHR to Cloud comes with benefits but poses various concerns, which continue to limit implementation in the healthcare system. The users’ sense of security and trust are major concerns in the implementation of a Cloud-based EHR. Therefore, there is a need for the investigation of factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in order to develop a better understanding of the issue and formulate effective measures of addressing it. This leads to the development of this study’s research questions:

1.2 Research Questions

-          What process has been used to integrate EHR to the Cloud?

-          What factors influence the user's sense of security and trust of such integration?

-          To what extend do the users' sense of security and trust affect the implementation of a Cloud-integrated EHR system? and

-          What implications does this have to the integration process and the future of managing EHR?

This research question will be addressed effectively by focusing on achieving the following research objectives.

1.3 Research Aims/Objectives

The research aims to:

-          Critically discuss the integration of EHR to Cloud.

-          Comprehensive discusses the factors that influence users' sense of security and trust in integrating EHR to the Cloud.

-          Outline the extent to which users' of security and trust has affected the implementation of a Cloud-integrated EHR system.

-          To assess the implication of users' sense of security to the integration process and the future of managing EHR.

1.4 Justification for the Research

            There is increasing pressure for the integration of EHR in healthcare. The efficiency of EHR in developing digital identities for patients and improving their interoperability in various heterogeneous systems has resulted in significant success for Cloud computing in healthcare. However, numerous concerns influence the users’ sense of security and trust in EHR integration to Cloud. According to Lyu, et al. (2016), security and privacy are the major concerns in Cloud computing, especially in the incorporation EHR into the technology. Many patients and healthcare providers worry about the possible violation of patient privacy. Moreover, Deshmukh (2016) cites an increasing trend towards the integration and use of Cloud technology in EHR. The author states that while technologies are increasingly becoming popular for sharing data and communicating online, the applications' storage of personal information makes such data when the security requirements are unmet. Lyu, et al. (2016) states that Cloud storage servers store users’ records including patient health information, locations, and other personal information. Access to the information by unintended people breaches the users’ right to privacy.

            Even when technological advancement has improved the security of Cloud computing and data storage, various factors continue to influence the users’ sense of security and trust. Deshmukh (2016) states that there is limited research in the area, mainly on the factors that determine the trust and sense of security. According to Ashibani and Mahmoud (2017), and Subashini and Kavitha (2011) most research on integrating EHR to Cloud revolves around its effectiveness in improving healthcare delivery, security, and efficiency amongst others. There is minimal literature on what influences the users’ sense of security. Therefore, this research identifies this gap and focuses on offering a comprehensive research on the topic. The information presented in this research forms a basis for future research. Information on the users’ sense of security and trust adds to existing knowledge to enhance understanding of the factors that influence these user aspects.

1.5 Research Methodology – Outline

According to Creswell (2014), the effectiveness of the research methodology influences the accuracy and precision of data and results, which determine the credibility, validity, and reliability of the research. This research places emphasis on the factors influencing users’ sense of security and trust in the integration of EHR to Cloud. Therefore, it focuses mainly on outlining and understanding users’ perceptions and experiences. According to Çuhadar (2014), the integration of these aspects into research demands the application of the phenomenological research technique. Çuhadar (2014) describes a phenomenological study as a qualitative research method that captures participants’ experiences and perspectives on the issues under study. Further, considering that the integration of EHR into Cloud affects large populations, the integration of the qualitative research approach was deemed essential for representing these populations precisely and accurately. An interview was the most effective method applied for the collection of data. Therefore, this research applies the qualitative and numerical research methodology. The application of this technique enhances the credibility and reliability of research (Kuada, 2012).

Furthermore, the methodology includes a comprehensive literature review, a studious research design, and a consideration for ethics. Creswell (2014) argues that existing literature and research informs current and future research. Integrating existing literature in research offers a ground for developing meaningful research and new insights, and sets ground for further research. This research integrates credible resources from peer-reviewed journal articles and other scholarly materials that enhance its credibility and validity whilst knitting ideas coherently and logically to facilitate a better understanding of the concepts covered. Effective data collection tools and methods are applied to gather credible information/data (Kuada, 2012). The techniques such as content, numerical and critical analysis applied in analyzing the data and developing findings are equally effective. Prominently, the question of ethics is observed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dissertation Structure

Chapter I - Introduction

This chapter offers a background of the study by discussing the application of EHR to Cloud. It outlines the influence of the new technology on the EHR and a glimpse of the users’ perceptions. The discussion of the Cloud-based EHR identifies the users’ security concerns and trust issues. This section also includes the research question, a justification thereof, and its aims. It presents the outline of the methodology, and the structure of the dissertation.

Chapter II - Literature Review

This chapter acknowledges the importance of an informed research and offers a comprehensive discussion and critical analysis of existing literature. The review focuses on integrating expert knowledge and opinion in the research. The different areas covered include - the influence of new technologies in the development of the healthcare system, the integration of information technology in improving and promoting efficiency in information management, and integrating EHR to Cloud. Most importantly, the literature review discusses the security and privacy concerns and their influence on trust. It creates a basis for research on the factors that influence the sense of security and trust in integrating EHR to Cloud computing.

Chapter III - Methodology

This chapter outlines the research methodology applied in conducting this study.

Chapter IV - Findings

This chapter presents the data/information and findings of the research. 

Analysis and Conclusion

The analysis and conclusion section offers an extensive yet articulate discussion of the findings and a summary of the research.

Summary

The incorporation of new technologies in the healthcare system continues to improve the quality and safety of services. This chapter discusses the inclusion of EHR to Cloud and the influence it has on the management of patient information and the healthcare in general. The discussion offers a background for the development of the research. The research questions and research justification areas point out a major research gap in the area. The introduction breaks ground for a succinct research on the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in EHR to Cloud.


 

CHAPTER II

Literature Review

2.0 Introduction

Quality improvement in healthcare remains a broad space of research considering the different elements that contribute to the achievement of success in the sector. The improvement of the efficiency of healthcare systems through the adoption of numerous strategies and measures for enhancing performance, quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness amongst other elements has in the recent past showed significant progress (Russo, 2016). The healthcare system is now more developed than ever. There is significant research demonstrating the importance of quality and efficient healthcare delivery in a country. Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013) states that the promotion and protection of the health and well-being of the citizenry, which is a mandate of every government, lies within the ability to develop and support efficient systems. In the recent past, the improvement of the information systems in healthcare settings has contributed significantly towards the development of the healthcare systems. The Health IT (2017) argues that the implementation of EMR and the EHR has resulted in enhanced quality in the delivery of services.

Young, et al. (2017),Deshmukh (2016), and Roehrs, et al. (2017), as well as other scholars alike, argue and endorse the importance of the EHR in enhancing the efficiency of  healthcare systems. The implementation of the health record system has simplified the storage of patient information, access, and retrieval during the processes of delivering care. Sermeus, et al. (2016) poses that the EHR continues to influence improvement in service delivery but that there are challenges affecting the use of EHR. This section offers an in-depth review and analysis of existing literature on the EHR and delves deeper into the concerns surrounding the implementation of the system. The analysis places greater emphasis on the integration of the EHR to Cloud. While Coats and Achary (2014) point out that though the integration of the EHR to Cloud is fundamentally important to promoting efficiency in the system, Rodrigues, et al. (2016) asserts that the implementation is greatly affected by the issues of insecurity and data breach amongst others. Therefore, this literature review goes deeper into outlining the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in integrating the EHR to Cloud.

2.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)

 

The electronic medical and health record systems have the healthcare information that is meant to facilitate the efficiency of the healthcare system. The development and implementation of the EMR resulted in better clinical and medical data collection. The EHR builds on the EMR but it is more comprehensive. According to Duckert and Rose (2013), the EHR goes beyond the collection of data in the healthcare provider’s office to the inclusion of a more integrated patient history. The author asserts that EHR systems are designed for containing and sharing information from providers of healthcare services to a particular patient. The EHR makes sure that all providers can access timely information concerning the history of a patient under their care. In discussing the EHR system, Steele (2016) argues that the system has played a significant role in improving the management of patient information and consultation by authorized personnel in different healthcare organizations. The inclusion of the EHR allows a patient to receive quality healthcare services across different healthcare institutions. As Sinha, et al. (2013) put it, the system allows patients to move with their health records and gives them the opportunity to authorize its use by other healthcare specialists, providers, and institutions across the country.

The EHR builds on the benefits of the EMR in the provision of care. According to the Health IT (2017), the EMR is a paper chart generated electronically or digitally that contains the medical or clinical history of the patient from a practice. The application of the EMR in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient enhances effectiveness in the process. However, the provider lacks a comprehensive patient history, which the EHR provides. The importance of the EMR is undeniable. Jawhari, et al. (2016) and Keenan, et al. (2016) argue that the effective implementation of EMR systems allows for data tracking over time, the identification of the patients due for screenings and preventive visits amongst others. Moreover, the EMR facilitates patient monitoring and determination of how they measure up to clinical/medical parameters. These parameters may include vaccinations and readings such as blood pressure and sugar levels amongst others. Keenan, et al. (2016) states that the implementation of the EMR expedites quality improvement and practice efficiency.

The EHR builds on the EMR system and offers significant efficiency and improvement of the quality of care. Keenan, et al. (2016) posits that the EMR allows the storage of data but data-sharing among providers and specialists outside one practice is difficult. The author argues that despite the implementation of the EMR, healthcare provision remained inefficient and limited due to the challenges of sharing information that the system poses. The electronic health record improves on the electronic medical record by, mainly, facilitating the effective sharing of the information (Sermeus, et al., 2016). Jawhari, et al. (2016) defines the EHR like the EMR but with enhanced ability to incorporate more information in a real-time, patient-centered approach. The EHR gives authorized users the ability to access and retrieve information instantly. In the process, the EHR ensures safety and security of the information by protecting it from unauthorized users. Even so, many patients still feel that the EHR is unsafe and information can be accessed without their consent.

Elkhenini, et al. (2015) offers a similar definition of the EHR as Jawhari, et al. (2016). The author defines the system as capable of holding the patients’ medical and treatment histories and places it at the disposal of authorized staff and providers for use in delivering health care services. Bell and Thornton (2011) offer a similar description of the EHR and states that it goes beyond the storage of standard data to include the medical/health history, previous diagnoses, medication and treatments, scheduled dates for certain services, health concerns such as allergies, laboratory results, test results, and radiology images among others (Russo, 2016). The continued application of the EHR allows the continued integration of evidence-based approaches in healthcare delivery by allowing access to the tools that assist healthcare providers in making care decisions. Schuman (2017) states that the EHR has been greatly beneficial in improving patient care, the involvement of patients in the healthcare processes, enhancing coordination and efficiency, and promoting cost-effectiveness.

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System

Different authors, Darko-Yawson and Ellingsen (2016), Steele (2016), and The AORN (2013) point out that the effective implementation of the EHR system is critical for the achievement of healthcare goals. The EHR supports the improvement of quality and safety in healthcare by promoting efficient patient care. Bell and Thornton (2011) assert that the implementation of the EHR guarantees the improvement of the quality and convenience of the health care. The EHR gives providers quick and easy access to patient information and health records. According to (Sinha, et al., 2013), the access promotes coordination and enhances efficiency in care. Darko-Yawson and Ellingsen (2016) assert that EHR improves fundamental elements of healthcare such as decision-making, prescription, and performance among others. He argues that the system exposes providers to tools for improving their performance and reporting. However, inefficiency in integrating the EHR into the system and creating awareness of its safety and security continues to limit its full acceptance and use in acquiring healthcare (Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013).

Elkhenini, et al.(2015) and Goldberg, et al. (2012) describe the EHR as a critical system for the improvement of the quality of services. EHR facilitates efficiency information access and availability, which influence the whole process of health care service delivery. EHRs offer a platform for storing health information of patients in a single place making it possible for the providers from different health centers to access the information when the patient requires care. Additionally, the EHR gives articulate and accurate health information for integration in providing health care. According to Steele (2016), the reliable information available in the system is essential for effective decision-making. Goldberg, et al. (2012) state that decision-making is a critical component of healthcare provision that requires accurate and reliable information. The providers utilize information from the EHR to make decisions on what approach to take to manage or treat certain conditions. Wickramasinghe (2016) adds that the EHRs provide clinical reminders and alerts, allow improved aggregation, and assist providers in integrating the safeguards for preventing adverse events when offering health care.

Darko-Yawson and Ellingsen (2016) discuss the improvement of patient participation in the processes of care as another essential benefit of the system. The platform for sharing patient history and medical/clinical information and data allows the integration of the patient in the process of providing care. The EHR allows the healthcare providers (HWCs) and patients to share and access the patient’s information. This creates room for the development of collaborative approaches to managing certain conditions. Health IT (2017) describes the EHR as critical for the management and treatment of chronic conditions such as obesity and asthma among others. Additionally, Lorenzi, et al. (2009) and Deshmukh (2016) assert that the implementation of the EHR in the recent past has recorded success in improving patient participation in the processes of health care provision. Jawhari, et al. (2016) state that the system contributes greatly towards quality improvement and creates an efficient communication avenue that empowers the patients to take part in health care processes. The creation of schedules and programs for medication and attendance of clinical and medical appointments improves enhances the provider’s ability to identify the symptoms.

Lorenzi, et al. (2009) state that the EHR is important for the improvement of diagnostics and patient outcomes. It offers the providers medical/clinical history and all information concerning the patient’s health history. The EHR carries information such as the vital signs that the patient shows, medical histories, immunization schedules, diagnoses, and progress notes among the others that enhance the process of diagnosis in the future. The healthcare providers use the information with permission to understand the history of the patient to make decisions. The provision of accurate and complete information about the patient ensures the provision of better medical care. According to Young, et al. (2017), the EHRs allows the utilization of the information to diagnose thus improving the ability of the specialist to perform effectively. Roehrs, et al. (2017) state that the integration of the information in medical care reduces cases of errors and promotes better outcomes. A study done by Bell and Thornton (2011) shows that more than 94 percent of healthcare providers who use the information available in EHRs effectively report enhanced effectiveness in accessing the readily available information when required. Additionally, 88% and 75% respectively state that EHRs are critical for practice and improves the ability to provide superior patient care.

Moreover, Houser, et al. (2012) supports the idea that EHRs continue to play a fundamental role in assisting providers in diagnosis. The access given to providers to the EHR places the full information required for understanding the patient’s medical and health background. Understanding the history, as Health IT (2017) asserts, helps providers to diagnose the patient’s health issues fast. The quick identification of the health problems affecting the patients makes it possible for the provider to determine the most effective measures for treating and managing the conditions. Amatayakul and Amatayakul (2013) argue that effective EHRs equip the providers with the necessary information for the identification of the greatest risks a patient faces and reduces cases of errors. The inclusion of histories of chronic conditions or allergies, for instance, gives the provider sufficient enough that makes him or EHR avoid using medications or approaches that may cause the recurrence of a certain condition or other health complications (Russo, 2016). The importance of the EHRs in this perspective is undeniable.

Research shows that the application of HER improves quality and enhances satisfaction. Duffy (2010) points out that the application of EHRs leads to quality improvement and an increment in patient satisfaction. The author cites statistics that show 92 percent of patients were happy when their doctors used the EHRs to prescribe. The application of the EHRs minimizes time wastage and serves the patients effectively (Wickramasinghe, 2016). Using e-prescription enables the physician to prescribe following determinations made upon analysis based on the information on the EHR (Darko-Yawson & Ellingsen, 2016). Further, the effectiveness of the EHR system is shown in Duffy’s study, which finds that 90 percent of patients find the system effective since it minimizes time-loss in the processes of prescription. In showing the impact of the EHR in improving efficiency, the study found that 76 percent of patients found the EHRs more efficient and easier while 63 percent reported minimal medical errors (Duffy, 2010). These results show the importance of applying the EHRs effectively in the provision of health care.

Additionally, the EHRs improves the quality of care through the transformation of the clinical process. Goldberg, et al. (2012) state that any hospital that implements the EHR stands a better chance for improved health care and better outcomes than those that do not. While this does not mean that hospitals that do not have the system are outright inefficient, the implementation of EHRs enhances clinical processes. According to Sinha, et al. (2013), the implementation of the EHRs results in better clinical processes. The research identifies the case of a Vermont hospital that implemented the system causing a significant decrease of 60 percent in near-miss healthcare/medical events (Bell & Thornton, 2011). Additionally, the hospital recorded an increase in completion of assessments and reduced cases of staying in the hospital for longer. The integration of the EHRs in different healthcare settings will play an important role in transforming the medical and clinical processes (Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi, 2013).

The integration of EHR into the healthcare systems results in improved efficiencies and cost-effectiveness. These two elements define the acceptability and accessibility of the health care. The AORN (2013) notes that EHR improves efficiency in medical practice. A research done by Kumar and Bauer (2011) identified that 79% of providers who are ready for meaningful use find the EHR important for application in enhancing the efficiency of the practice. Doctors and other providers understand the need of reviewing the client’s history before diagnosis and medication. Further, 82 percent and 75 percent participants of the study find e-prescription and the reception of lab results via the EHRs more respectively to be more effective, less time-consuming, and faster. The integration of the form of information collection and storage has improved efficiency in offering Medicare significantly. Most importantly, the EHRs leads to a significant cost reduction and higher profit efficiency. Kumar and Bauer (2011) state that financial benefits may range between$37 million and $59 million in five years. The automation of numerous time-consuming and labor-intensive processes reduces the costs of operation and improves efficiency. Efficient practices results in improved quality, patient satisfaction, and profit-efficiency among other benefits.

 

 

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

The application of the ICT in healthcare plays a fundamental role in improving the quality of care. According to Chen, et al. (2012), the technological advancement recorded in the past years has resulted in the development of all aspects of life. The integration of new technologies in the healthcare setting, for instance, triggers continuous quality improvement by enhancing efficiency, safety, and effective management. The adoption and implementation of the EMR and the EHR are some of the most significant improvements in the healthcare sector (Keenan, et al., 2016). These elements of ICT influence quality improvement by promoting efficiency in storing, retrieving, and applying patient information and medical/clinical history to diagnose, treat and manage the health problems facing patients (Coats & Acharya, 2014). Chen, et al. (2012) supports the forgoing assertion by citing that the implementation of the EHR comes with multiple benefits. However, as new technologies emerge, the need for adopting more efficient and impactful technologies is undeniable. The recent and rising increase in the integration of Cloud to EHR is one of the new technologies that are revolutionizing the healthcare sector.

According to Alabdulatif, et al. (2013) the number of people using the EHR integrated to Cloud is increasing considerably. However, there are numerous concerns of challenges surrounding the development of the healthcare sector using technologies. Mirza and El-Masri (2012) cite some of the challenges as the high cost for implementation and use of the services, security and privacy security concerns, and the maintenance of the systems. The EHR faces these challenges, which make many institutions desist from implementing. However, institutions that have implemented the EHR benefit significantly. According to Niles (2017), many institutions are adopting and implementing the EHR but many others are fearful of the costly implementation and maintenance. Health institutions that lag behind will soon find themselves incapable of surviving or competing effectively. Chen, et al. (2012) state that there is a shift towards the integration of EHR to Cloud computing for the enhancement of the efficiency of the system. The major purpose, according to Elkhenini, et al.(2015), is the achievement of improved healthcare efficiency, better healthcare and patient outcomes, and improved systems’ efficiency among others.

In the analysis of the influence of Cloud computing to EHR, Stair and Reynolds (2016) offer an in-depth discussion of the topic and integrates a comprehensive Cloud computing system for an integrated EHRs. The author argues for the need to ensure an effective Central Database and a Unifier Interface Middleware to mask the heterogeneity and standardize the communication between the Cloud EHR and the EHR standards. Mirza and El-Masri (2012) cite different studies that outline the major challenges facing the integration. The study shows that the high costs of development, maintenance, physician’s resistance, insufficient IT personnel, and uncertainty concerning the return on investment pose a significant challenge in adopting and implementing the Cloud-integrated EHRs. The implementation of the strategy would be important in the enhancement of efficacy in healthcare systems’ handling of patient information (Lyu, et al., 2016). As the shift from paperwork to the EHR system advances and continues to influence the provision of health care, there is a need to advance this impact by promoting greater efficiency through Cloud. Alabdulatif, et al. (2013) argue for the importance of ensuring that healthcare organizations adopt and implement EHR and Cloud.

Mirza and El-Masri (2012) describe the technology of Cloud computing as a new, comprehensive, and thought-provoking solution in Information Technology. The author points out the ability of the technology to leverage Intranet and Internet allowing people using the Internet to share information without any barriers. According to Stair and Reynolds (2016), by integrating the technology to EHR healthcare institutions stand a better chance for enhanced efficiency in the management of patient information and the effective use of the information in promoting care. Implementing the technology into EHR improves cost-effectiveness and scalability. Mirza and El-Masri (2012) cite the definition of  Cloud as "a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (for example, networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.” The definition shows the possible impact Cloud can have when integrated into a service such as the EHR. The application of Cloud offers a securable and multitenant platform managed by the provider of the Cloud.

The integration of EHR to Cloud facilitates the system to adopt EHR for the numerous healthcare institutions. The technology offers a securable platform and other features such as multitenancy and scalability, with authorized data interactions under the management of the Cloud provider (Mirza & El-Masri, 2012). The Cloud provider can authorize data transactions by giving the care providers the chance for sharing information with one or multiple users of the system with authorized access. Alabdulatif, et al. (2013)state that the development of such a system would allow, for instance, a city’s population to integrate into the  Cloud’s electronic health record system without challenges of maintenance, security, and space. Wickramasinghe (2016) identifies the importance of using such as system in the healthcare sector by arguing that this would promote the quality of care, enhance cost-effectiveness, and remove barriers that limit health care services access and acceptance. Moreover, the author suggests the integration of different types of EHR into the Cloud will promote the efficiency of the system in addressing the concerns of the patients while benefitting the show.

 Coats and Acharya (2014) argue for the importance of integrating the EHR to Cloud and suggests the identification of the requirements of the system. The author identifies information ownership, issues of authenticity and authentication, and non-repudiation as some of the critical requirement in the development of an integrated EHR. As a system that deals with personal and institutional data and information, the establishment of clear guidelines on the information ownership is essential for protecting the user information from access by unauthorized users (Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013). The ownership of the information enables the prevention of frauds and unauthorized use or misuse of the patients' information. Sermeus, et al (2016) support the author on the issue of authentication and authenticity by stating that the system, implementation, and use should be guided by the authentication; the establishment or confirmation of the truthfulness of claims made. Authenticity, on the other hand, includes the elements such as truthfulness in originality, attribution and intentions. The consideration of these requirements in the implementation of the EHR is important for enhanced efficiency.

Moreover, the willingness to fulfill the contractual obligations (non-repudiation), consensual agreement and authorization, availability, integrity, audit and archiving are other critical requirements. The parties involved in the must show integrity and non-repudiation. These requirements ensure consistency and accuracy of the data, and involve the patient in the process, who must acknowledge and consent to the use of personal information with other providers (Lorenzi, et al., 2009). Chen, et al. (2012) explores the requirements offering essential information to any institution willing to integrate the EHR to the Cloud. The discussion of the elements of availability and utility as requirements states that the system requires all the essential parts of the system to function effectively. Moreover, Young, et al. (2017) posit, the recording and archiving user activity is equally critical for preventing cases of misuse or unauthorized access.

 

 

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud

As an emerging topic, there is minimal research on the Cloud-integrated EHR, which makes it a key research area. However, some authors have explored the topic extensively. For instance, the Fernández-Alemán, et al. (2013),Niles (2017) and Ozair, et al., 2015) discuss security and privacy regarding the EHR and Cloud computing significantly. Ozair (et al. (2015) define privacy as the claim by a person or group to be let alone. The author integrates the definition of Justice Louis Brandeis and Dennis Warren who defined privacy as a person’s right ‘to be let alone’. The application of this determination allows the protection of patient’s right to privacy. The use of the EHR, according to Sermeus, et al.(2016), and adoption of the system in hospitals is mainly affected by the issue of privacy. The author states that most people do not use the platform for fear of data breach and theft of personal information.

Fernández-Alemán, et al. (2013) describe security and privacy as critical components in the development of EHR and integration of Cloud computing. The author state that hackers, computer or Internet worms, and viruses influence the privacy of the EHR user significantly. Kelley (2016) posits that in the recent past the healthcare sector has experienced data loss or increasing theft of patient clinical data.The author’s advises that there is a need for more effective strategies and tools for the protection of the data and information from theft and misuse. Young, et al.(2017) support the author by stating the importance of increased security and creation of imprenetrable systems. Further, Rodrigues, et al.(2016)argues that the use of EHRs in the  Cloudfor storing sensitive information requires a comprehensive data protection. Any institution that integrates and allows the storage of information on the system must consider the development of an efficient data protection system.

The development of precautionary measures against the breach of privacy, the assurance of safety, and the data confidentiality are important components. The confidentiality of user data is critical for ascertaining the promotion of their privacy. Rodrigues, et al. (2013) states that the development of trust is essential for ensuring transparency in parenting. The institution and individual users must focus on establishing trust with the  Cloud provider. The Cloud service team must ensure that it adheres to all the contractual terms of an agreement. The continued interaction in good faith promtes trust and improves the engagement betweenthe  Cloud provider and the institution’s management. This protects the user from data theft and misuse by unauthroised persons. Kelley (2016) states that the implementation of privacy and security in an integrated  Cloud/EHR system is a major challenge for most of the healthcare institutions across the country.

Moreover, Ozair, et al. (2015) states that one of the most impactful issues about the Cloud-integrated EHR is the issue of security breach and involvement in patient privacy. Security breach prevents the user from enjoying the quiet of privacy. The implementation of measures for the protection of confidential information, according to Kelley (2016), adheres to the rules of individual consent. The loss of the right to privacy allows any person to use or promote information associated with the person without privacy. Ozair, et al. (2015) integrates data from major research by the Howard university Hospital that states that insecurity or poor data security risks the exploitation of many people. The implementation of measures such as firewalls, the inclusion of software for the development, antivirus, and software for determining intrusion are critical for the development of a comprehensive data security. Additionally, Niles (2017) argues that there is a need for developing policies and frameworks for the management of the maintenance of patient privacy and ensuring minimal risks when it comes to confidentiality.

Gavrilov and Trajkovik (2012) discuss the issue of security in the Cloud computing extensively by asserting that the issue of security occurs in terms of trust, identify management, architecture, software isolation, and data protection. The authors argue that Cloud computing developed from an amalgamation of new technologies such as service-oriented architecture, utility computing g, and virtualization. The authors assert that the major issue of concern is that the infrastructure of Clod computing depends mainly on trusted computing. Therefore, like Alabdulatif, et al. (2013) point out, the interconnection between security and trust is undeniable. The consideration of one without the other would only lead to the unsuccessful implementation of the technology. The integration of Cloud computing to EHR requires the institution and patients to develop and maintain trust on the Cloud server provider. However, according Stair and Reynolds(2016), there is an increasingly growing concern of about the breach of privacy and access to the patients’ information by unauthorized people. Gavrilov and Trajkovik (2012) state that one of the major causes for the continued privacy concerns is because of the non-existence of a clear privacy regulation in Cloud computing. The integration of the technology into EHR without distinct regulation and guarantee of privacy and security will continue to pose a challenge on the adoption and implementation of Cloud-EHR.

Fernández-Alemán, et al. (2013) discuss the issues of privacy and security in-depth by incorporating research from different areas of the world. The authors come to a simple conclusion that the EHR features, mainly security and privacy, are the major issue influencing its adoption and implementation forthe enhancement of efficiency in the healthcare sector. Deshmukh (2016) argue for the need to identify the most effective data protection techniques for the EHRs. Moreover, the research identifies security and privacy concerns as the major hinderances in other countries as well. Wickramasinghe(2016) outlines data security concerns among EHR users in Denmark, New Zealand, and Germany. The integration of the EHR, which is mainly affected by people’s data security and privacy concerns, to Cloud computing shows the possibility of even greater challenges on the features.People are more likely to continue mistrusting the EHR and the Cloud computing technology over the concerns of security and privacy (Sinha, et al., 2013).

2.5 Summary

This chapter offers an extensive discussion and analysis of existing literature on theEHR, compares the technology with the EMR and delves deeper into the analysis of the benefits of the electronic health record. Further, the review places emphasis on the integration of the EHR to Cloud computing identifies the challenges hindering the adoption and implementation in the healthcare setting. Most importantly, the review of literature covers the major areas of study in this research. The analysis of research on the security and privacy concerns in incorporating EHR into Cloud computing sets a pace for the continuation of the research on the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in integrating EHR to  Cloud.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

The effectiveness of the research methodology determines the credibility of the study. According to Coyle and Lyons (2013), the effectiveness of the research methodology is defined by the methods and techniques applied in conducting of the research. This study applies different methods to understand the factors that affect the use of EHR integration to Cloud on the aspects of security and trust. This chapter explores the research philosophy, strategy, design, and research administration and ethics. It explores every aspect of research methodology and explains the choice and application of each method clearly. Every choice is based on the ability of the method or technique to contribute towards the effectiveness of the research. This study considers Khan’s argument that the research methodology defines the accuracy and credibility of the information collected and the overall reliability and credibility of the research (Khan, 2012). The analysis of the philosophy, strategy, design, administration, and the research ethics in the following sub-topics show justifications and the possible influence of each method or technique applied in the course of the research.

3.2 Research Philosophy

The development of an articulate, credible, and a reliable research depends significantly on the effective application of a suitable research philosophy for the particular study. The choice of a research philosophy, according to Jost, et al. (2012), depends on the type of the research, the objectives, and the possible strategies applicable. This research aims to understand the factors that affect the sense of security and trust in the integration of EHR to cloud. To meet this aim, the study seeks to explore the processes that haves been used to integrate EHR to the Cloud. It would also assess the factors that influence the user's sense of security and trust of such integration. It would consider the extent to which users' sense of security and trust affect the implementation of a Cloud-integrated EHR system and what implications this has on the integration process and the future of managing EHR. Doing the above will uncover people’s perceptions and perspectives while enhancing the understanding of why  they would or would not like to integrate their health records with cloud. The application of methods that uncover these concerns and integrate expert opinion on the matter is critical for the development of a comprehensive and articulate research (Check & Schutt, 2011). This study employs the phenomenological qualitative research technique to capture the experiences, concerns, and perspectives of the users of EHR and the factors that affect their sense of security. Capturing these issues will require the integration of the numerical research techniques for the analysis of the data in addition to the interview data.

The application of the qualitative research technique enhances the effectiveness of the data collection and analysis for the development of a credible and well-researched study. According to Hays and Singh (2012), the qualitative research method allows the analysis of a smaller sample without the isolation of variables. The method offers critical insights in the development of studies that focus on capturing perceptions, thoughts, concerns, and experiences. The application of this method in this research offers a broad base for the analysis of the issues of concern. Further, Rubin and Babbie (2011) argue that the explorative nature of the qualitative research approach allows an in-depth understanding of issues that influence people. The use of the method in health care and research in the sector allows the researcher to capture the experiences and explore them extensively to understand phenomenon and issues under study. Therefore, the application of this method in the study is greatly important for the development of an articulate, credible, and reliable study.

 

3.3 Research Strategy

The choice of the research strategy is critical for the development of good research. The sequential development of research from the identification of the topic, the investigation of the possible, the influence of such research on the field and the society, and its contribution to the choice of the research philosophy and other key research areas facilitates effectiveness and the comprehensiveness of the study. The research strategy influences the development of a credible and reliable research. According to Rubin and Babbie(2011), the research strategy plays a fundamental role in shaping the research, the accuracy of the data collected, and the reliability of the data analysis techniques. The research strategy determines how accurate the data collected is, in relation to the topic of discussion or under study. Effective data collection strategy allows the integration of precise, accurate, and appropriate data in research. Further, according to Belk (2006), the development of a good research strategy defines the ability of the research to meet the objectives of the study and influences the applicability of the research in future.

According to Hays and Singh,( 2012), the identification of the most effective research methods before the commencement of the study is crucial for developing a good research. This research identified the qualitative research technique and numerical analysis of the data as central research methods. Moreover, the identification of the data collection techniques is equally essential for the enhancement of effectiveness in the development of the study. While the research principles, universal research ethics, and guidelines for research are important for research, the research strategy defines and ensures that the researcher(s) follows all the necessary guidelines/principles and ethical practices in the collection and analysis of data. In studying the process used to integrate EHR to the cloud and the factors that influence user's sense of security and trust of such integration, this research applies a comprehensive research that uses in-depth interview collection data and content to analyse it. Numerical analysis is also used to analyse numerical data. Moreover, it integrates different research components that facilitate the processes of data collection, analysis, and presentation.

According to Speziale and Carpenter (2011), a good research strategy comprises of different research components such as an excellent research design and research paradigms that enable effectiveness in data sampling, collection, and analysis. In studying the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in the integration of EHR into Cloud, the integration of different research components is essential for capturing the users’ perceptions and experiences. The development of the information systems in the health care setting is essential for the enhancement of efficiency in the delivery of care. The efficiency improves the quality and safety of care and ascertains continued improvement. Capturing the perceptions and experiences of the users of EHR integrated to Cloud is important in improving the systems. Achievement of success in the process requires the incorporation of specific research paradigms that shape the processes of decision-making in conducting research. As a qualitative research, this study employs the interpretivist and positivist paradigms to enhance the effectiveness of the research (Jost, et al., 2012).

The interpretivist and positivist research ontologies influence the collection and analysis of data in this research significantly. Rubin and Babbie (2010) state that the application of the interpretivist paradigm is essential in undertaking a qualitative research. The paradigm places emphasis on the description of the experiences, feelings, and idiosyncratic explanations for the different perspectives they hold. Since this research focuses on capturing and explaining the participants’ feelings, perspectives, and experiences, the application of the interpretivist's research paradigm is paramount. The interviews will allow the identification of the perspectives and experiences and the integration of the paradigm will outline an in-depth understanding of the factors. Furthermore, Check and Schutt (2011), relate that the interpretivist approach is flexible enough to allow the integration of the inductive research philosophy, which integrates qualitative techniques and facilitates better research. Coyle and Lyons (2013) state that the inductive approach generalizes specific reasoning to understand the perspectives and experiences of the participants. This makes it an effective paradigm for application in qualitative research.

3.4 Research Design

The integration of an excellent research strategy, philosophy, and paradigms enables the achievement of accurate data and information. However, according to Bazeley (2013), the efficiency of the research design influences the whole process. A research design involves the different approaches applied for the achievement of the aims and objectives of the research. In this study, the application of different research techniques allows the collection of information and analysis for the identification of the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in integrating EHR to Cloud. The application of the qualitative research method and the incorporation of the inductive research philosophy with an interpretivist approach improves the effectiveness of the research in achieving its objectives (Check & Schutt, 2011). Most importantly, the research applies an effective approach of participant identification and data collection. These approaches attach efficiency in the conduction of the research.

The research applies the interview method in the collection of data and information concerning the factors that affect the users’ sense of security and trust. The process requires the identification of the participants. It applies the random sampling technique, mainly simple random sampling to choose the participants. According to Bazeley (2013), the application of the simple random sampling technique proves effective in the development of a group that represents the population effectively. Applying the technique allows the representation of the community by reflecting the concerns of people in the society well. The participants are mainly patients requested and notified of the research objectives. Moreover, sample involves individuals in the society who have or have not used the EHR system integrated to Cloud. The initial steps of the research sampled 54 participants but seven people did not take part in the study due to personal commitments or ethical concerns. Therefore, 47 people took part in the study of whom 18 were interviewed.

a)      Questions directed to the expert participants

Question number

Link to the study

 

Linked to authorities/references

1.      How would you describe the importance or impact of the EHR on the quality and safety in healthcare provision?

Background on the EHR system and influence on healthcare. Rapport.

Links to:

1.0 Background Information

Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013);Wang, et al. (2016); Deshmukh(2016)

2.      Kindly describe the process of EHR integration to the Cloud. Do you think there is success? What can be done to promote efficiency of the system?

Understanding the EHR system and its effectiveness or lack thereof. The success of the system in meeting the objectives of its implementation. Supports or refutes arguments of other experts in the literature review.

Links to:

.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

Lyu, et al. (2016);

Deshmukh (2016);

Ashibani and Mahmoud (2017); Subashini and Kavitha (2011); Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013)

 

3.      From your expert point of view, how safe and trustworthy is an EHR integrated to the Cloud? Do you think there is any reason for concern?

Justification of the research. Identification of research gaps.

Outlines safety and efficiency of integrating EHR to Cloud.

Identifies concerns about safety of the system and the users’ trust.

Links to:

1.4 Justification for the Research

2.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud

 

Roehrs, et al. (2017);

Rodrigues, et al. (2016); Steele (2016);

Health IT (2017);

Keenan, et al. (2016);Sinha, et al. (2013)

Schuman (2017);

Lyu, et al. (2016);

Deshmukh (2016);

Ashibani and Mahmoud (2017); Subashini and Kavitha (2011); Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013)

 

 

 

4.      What would you say is the influence of the users’ sense of security and trust on the implementation of EHR integrated to Cloud?

2.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud

(Lyu, et al., 2016) (Russo, 2016) (Wickramasinghe, 2016) (Mirza & El-Masri, 2012) AORN (2013); (Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi, 2013); (Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013); (Bell & Thornton, 2011); (Coats & Acharya, 2014) (Duckert & Rose, 2013); (Darko-Yawson & Ellingsen, 2016;) (Health IT, 2017); (Jawhari, et al., 2016); (Roehrs, et al., 2017)

5.      What measures do you think can be adopted and implemented to ensure effectiveness in implementing the system? How well do you think the recommendation may influence the users’ sense of security and trust positively?

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud

(Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi, 2013); (Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013); (Bell & Thornton, 2011); (Coats & Acharya, 2014) (Duckert & Rose, 2013); (Darko-Yawson & Ellingsen, 2016); (Lyu, et al., 2016) (Russo, 2016) (Wickramasinghe, 2016) (Mirza & El-Masri, 2012)

 

 

b)     User Interviewees

Question number

Link to the study

 

Linked to authorities/references

1.      How would you describe the importance or impact of the EHR on the quality and safety in healthcare provision?

Background on the EHR system and influence on healthcare. Rapport.

Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013);Wang, et al. (2016); Deshmukh(2016)

2.      As a user of the EHR system, how effective do you find it?

2.1 The Electronic Health Record (EHR)

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

Lyu, et al. (2016);

Deshmukh (2016);

Ashibani and Mahmoud (2017); Subashini and Kavitha (2011); Ajami and Baqheri-Tadi (2013);

Roehrs, et al. (2017);

Rodrigues, et al. (2016); Steele (2016);

Health IT (2017);

Keenan, et al. (2016);Sinha, et al. (2013)

Schuman (2017);

 

3.      What is your perception or attitude towards the use of the EHR when integrated to Cloud?

2.2 The Importance of the EHR System.

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud.

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud.

 

Lyu, et al. (2016); Russo (2016); Wickramasinghe (2016); Mirza & El-Masri (2012);AORN (2013); Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi (2013); Amatayakul & Amatayakul (2013); Bell & Thornton (2011);Coats & Acharya(2014) (Duckert & Rose, 2013); (Darko-Yawson & Ellingsen, 2016;) (Health IT, 2017); (Jawhari, et al., 2016); (Roehrs, et al., 2017)

4.      What do you think influences your sense of security and trust in using the Cloud-integrated EHR system? How does it affect your willingness to use the system?

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud.

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud.

 

(Wickramasinghe, 2016)(Young, et al., 2017) (AORN, 2013) (Subashini & Kavitha, 2011) (Alabdulatif, et al., 2013) (Ashibani &Mahmoud, 2017) (Coats & Acharya, 2014) (Bell & Thornton, 2011) (Chen, et al., 2012) (Wang, et al., 2016) (Steele, 2016) (Roehrs, et al., 2017) (Houser, et al., 2012)

5.      What do you think can be done to improve your perception and attitude towards the use of an EHR system integrated to Cloud?

2.3 Integrating EHR to Cloud

2.4 Security and Privacy Concerns in Integrating EHR to Cloud.

(Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi, 2013); (Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013); (Bell & Thornton, 2011); (Coats & Acharya, 2014) (Duckert & Rose, 2013); (Darko-Yawson & Ellingsen, 2016); (Lyu, et al., 2016) (Russo, 2016) (Wickramasinghe, 2016) (Mirza & El-Masri, 2012)

 

3.5 Research Administration

This study involves different approaches for the achievement of accurate information and data for analysis to explore the factors that influence the use of EHR to Cloud. The participants that took part in the study were engaged differently depending on the method. The 18 interviewees comprised of nine (9) experts in Cloud computing technology and EHR experts within the health care sector. The other nine (9) were users of the system integrated with Cloud. Therefore, the questions applied differed significantly to outline the perspectives and experiences of the users and capture expert opinion and ideas on the topic. The interviews were conducted face-to-face between the researcher and the user-interviewees while the experts were engaged online. The names used in the research, especially those of the users are fictionalized to ensure that they offered accurate and reliable information. The experts were sent the interview questions over the email. The interview method enhanced the achievement of accurate information for application in the study. The interviews conducted face-to-face were recorded with the consent of the interviewees and analyzed later.

All the participants were either of EHR integrated to Cloud or non-users of the service. The interview were conducted in different health facilities where the potential participants were first informed of the purpose of the research and allowed to participate without coercion. According to Belk (2006), interview are effective for outlining different aspects of the topic under study. In this research, open-ended interview were administered. Speziale and Carpenter (2011) posit that open-ended questions allow the respondents to include personal experiences, perceptions, and attitudes concerning the topic.

The semi-structured and unstructured interviews and the open-ended questions used in the interview allowed the participants to offer information about their perceptions, attitudes, and feelings. The analysis of the information and data requires the application of an effective approach. According to Coyle and Lyons (2013), the application of the content analysis technique allows the effective analysis of the information. Çuhadar(2014) argues that the approach is effective in analysing the captured perspectives, feelings, attitudes, and thoughts. Further, content analysis integrates the interpretivist and inductive approaches in analysing data and information sufficiently. The method analyses information from interviews effectively. Moreover, the application of the numerical data analysis approach enhances the effectiveness of the analysis of the data for the interview. It allows the description of the information from interview participants.

 

 

 

 

3.6 Research Ethics

The concerns under study in this research are ethical. The major issues surrounding the users’ sense of security and trust are privacy, security, confidentiality, and safety of patient information. Failing to consider ethics in the research would end up overstepping the ethical issues. Therefore, in conducting the research, there is a need for the research to avoid approaches that might affect participant rights (Danis, 2012). Moreover, the participants must be informed beforehand of the purpose of the research and the different scenarios of applying the information they offer (Hoonaard & Hamilton, 2016). This research considered these aspects of ethics and ensured that participants only participated willingly, without coercion, and were informed of the research objectives and the application of their information in the research.

3.7 Chapter Summary

The research applies the qualitative research philosophy, which enables the collection of information concerning the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and thoughts of the users of the EHR integration to Cloud. Further, the choice of the research strategy and design is made depending on the ability of the methods to influence efficiency in the conduction of the research. The study applies the interpretivist research technique and the inductive approach in the analysis of the information. The method applies the interview method conducted through the administration of open-ended questions for the collection of data. The Interviews applied in the research create an excellent platform for participants to outline their attitudes, experiences, and perceptions truthfully and accurately. The effective administration of the different data collection techniques enhances the effectiveness of the process. Most importantly, the consideration of research ethics is a critical component of research. The different participants in this study participated willingly, without coercion, and promised to offer accurate and truthful information. They were informed of the intent and objectives of the research and those concerns about their identity their names were fictionalized. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER IV

4.0 Results and Findings

4.1 Introduction

            Understanding the different factors that affect the users’ sense of security and trust in using EHR integrated into Cloud requires the researcher to focus on capturing the perceptions, thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and concerns of the users. The data collection techniques applied in the conduction of this research focus on capturing the aforementioned. The application of the phenomenological qualitative research method allows the integration of interpretivist and positivist paradigms and a comprehensive research design that included the simple random sampling technique for the identification of participants. This part outlines the results/findings and presents them clearly using tables and charts to outline the factors under study. The study outlines various perspectives, experiences, thoughts, and captures attitudes and the perceptions of the cloud-integrated EHR system users. Most importantly, the study identifies and uses 47 participants from different cities across South Africa. These cities include Durban, Johannesburg, Cape Town, Pretoria, with an option of other cities of residence. Only critical information to studying the EHR system and its integration to Cloud and the factors that influence the users;’ sense of security and trust are incorporated in this section. The findings captured from the respondents are presented below for further analysis in the analysis and discussion chapter.

            The presentation excludes the general information about the cities of residence because of skewed representation. Additionally, it exempts the perceptions of patient’s health information to healthcare provider for lack of clarity on the parameter/factor under study. The focus is on the patient’s or users of the service and not the healthcare providers. The exclusion of the level of confidentiality required by respondents and the confidentiality on healthcare information as presented in question 9 part b is excluded on the basis of repetition and the inability to measure the parameters used. Further, the ‘should consent be sorted’ question presented in question 12 of the data collected is omitted in the presentation for redundancy since it is similar to question 11 and offers contradictory data. The measures for information leak are disregarded as less significant in studying the phenomenon identified in the research questions. All the other information is regarded critical for the development of a comprehensive study. 

4.2 Demographics, Healthcare and EHR

            Demographics influence access to healthcare services and the acceptability of certain technologies significantly. The research sought to find out the access to healthcare by the participants, their use of the EHR technology, and their views, perceptions, and attitudes in using the technology when integrated to cloud. The achievement of success in the process required the application of the random sampling technique to ensure the fair choice of the participants. Concerning residence, of the 47 people that participated, the largest number of participants came from Durban at 78.7 percent while the other cities contributed smaller percentage at 4.3%, 2.1%, 4.3%, and 10.6% for Cape Town residents, Johannesburg, Pretoria, and other cities respectively. Undertaking the study with a particular focus on the city of Durban is the explanation for the skewed representation of the participants, with the majority coming from Durban. The results are represented in the table below.

4.2.1 Tabled Representation of the Participant’s Place of Residence

City of Residence

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Durban

37

78.7

78.7

Cape Town

2

4.3

83.0

Johannesburg

1

2.1

85.1

Pretoria

2

4.3

89.4

Other City

5

10.6

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

            While the residence representation of the other cities may offer inaccurate results if the discussion is narrowed to the particular regions, the integration of the results and the analysis in terms of the healthcare access and acceptability in Durban and the urban areas offers accurate and reliable information. The application of the results and findings retrieved from the above participants on the national level would attach inaccuracy in the analysis since people living in remote and rural areas may have different experiences, attitudes towards the EHR system and its integration to cloud, and even less access to healthcare services as compared to those in major cities used for this study. Using the participants in the research is critical to the development of a dependable and credible research when it comes to the analysis of the use of the EHR integrated into cloud. The participants are effectively selected to determine the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust.

            The random sampling technique applied in the course of selecting the participants ensured that the interviewees come from different ages without discrimination or biased choice of a specific age or age group. The 47 participants in this study came from different age groups. The consideration of the issue of age was made to ensure ethical research and the participation of only people with the ability to make informed decisions. The age groups targeted are 16 – 20, 20 – 25, 26 – 30, 31 – 35, 36 – 40, 41 – 45, and 46+ years. The percentage of participants in terms of age groups were 6.4%, 34.0%, 23.4%, 12.8%, 21.3, 2.1%, and zero representation for the different age groups respectively. That the majority of participants lie between 21 years and 40 years shows the possibility of outlining the factors that influence the consumers’ sense of security and trust in using EHR integrated to cloud. An interesting bit in the sample analysis is that most people of the randomly selected are between 21 - 40 years. This resonates with South Africa’s population distribution. According to UNFPA (2017), 66 percent of South Africans are aged below 35 years. While this is the case, 24 percent of the population lie in the 15 – 24 age group. That the sampling led to the selection of a population with a higher percentage comprising of the youth shows a good representation of the South African population. The percentage of the SA young population stands at approximately 67 percent (UNFPA, 2017). The inclusion of the population by age group results depicts the reliability of the results.

4.2.2 Sampled Participants by Age

Age Groups

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

16-20

3

6.4

6.4

21-25

16

34.0

40.4

26-30

11

23.4

63.8

31-35

6

12.8

76.6

36-40

10

21.3

97.9

41-45

1

2.1

100.0

46+

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Further, the representation of the results in a bar graph allows a better understanding of the results. The analysis of the results and presentation in the following diagram shows the high number of participants ranging between 21 and 40 years.

The lack of representation of people aged over 40 years poses a concern of the accuracy of the results if generalized. However, the concern will be addressed mainly by analysing results per the group rather than making population generalizations. The older generation is more concerned about the integration of technologies such as the EHR in the management of patient information. The general perception among the elder generation is that they are ineffective and often insecure as compared to the conventional patient information management techniques. Most people aged 40 and above are more likely to be sceptical about the integration of EHR into the management of the information in healthcare facilities. The provision of healthcare services and the storage and management of the information is perceived as insecure by most of the older generations. The consideration of this, and the fact that the research focuses on identifying the critical factors influencing the sense of security and trust shows the possible ineffectiveness of the research in identifying the concerns.

The research requires the integration of views and opinions of users of integrated EHR across the age groups. Leaving out users above 40 years out of the data collection groups would make it difficult to attain sufficient views as most of the young people have contrasting views with the elder age groups. People above 40 are more likely to perceive the integrated EHR as insecure and, therefore, have difficulty trusting the technology. That there is only 2.13% representation of the group makes it difficult to outline the issues influencing their sense of security and trust in using the system. However, the percentage used is essential in pinpointing some of the concerns that make it difficult for the generation to adopt and use the integrated EHR system with confidence and trust. The integration of the thoughts, views, and experiences of the younger generation with the 40+ participant allow the development of a comprehensive study that allows the researcher to identify the key factors that influence the patients’ sense of security and trust when using the integrated EHR.

4.3 Accessing Hospitals or Healthcare Services

            In studying the factors that influence users’ sense of security and trust in using EHR integrated into Cloud, the investigation of the visitation to hospitals is critical. The users must have access to healthcare services and understand the application of the technology. The frequency of visiting hospitals may not influence how a person feels about using the technology, determining whether the frequency is essential. Persons who visit healthcare services have different experiences of using the EHR system integrated into cloud. People who never use the service can only speculate or show perceptions, which may sometimes be misinformed. The consideration of a sample of people who have access to and use the public healthcare services is essential in the development of a better understanding of the factors. According to the sample studied, 14.9 percent of the participants stated that they never visit hospitals or public healthcare services. The high percentage poses a challenge in determining articulately the factors that may affect their sense of security and trust in using the integrated EHR system.

            Asking the participants the frequency of visiting the hospitals was critical to developing a better understanding of the correlation between the use of the healthcare services and the technologies applied in the provision of the services. People who visit the healthcare facilities frequently understand the various shortcomings and advantages of the various technologies used in providing healthcare. In the quest to capture the experiences of the participants, their thoughts and opinions, and their perceptions of the application of the integrated EHR to cloud, asking the frequency of use of the services was essential. The question set the ground for other questions focused on enhancing the ability to capture all the essential elements of the research.

Although people who rarely visit healthcare facilities are more likely to have limited personal experiences about the services, their  input, thoughts and perceptions were critical to understanding the topic and the development of the study. Arguments by different authors show that the major concern in using the EHR system integrated to cloud was security and the breach of confidentiality and privacy through unauthorized access to information, people who rarely visit hospitals are less likely to experience these concerns but may still hold perceptions that may reveal the factors that influence the sense of security and trust in using the integrated EHR. 

            The high percentage of people who often or sometimes (4% and 42.6% respectively) visit healthcare facilities  support  the development of a comprehensive study. Patients who access and use healthcare services understand the processes, systems, quality concerns, confidentiality, privacy, and any other concerns that define the acceptability of the services. Of the participants, those who seek healthcare services often are more likely to have broader experiences about the technologies applied in the provision of services such as the integrated EHR. The participants can contribute greatly towards understanding the issues that influence the senses of trust and security in using the EHR. While the EHR integration to cloud may be faced with different challenges, mainly the unacceptability by the users or the lack of confidence or trust in using the technology. The integration of the views of the people who visit hospitals often makes it possible to outline the critical issues affecting the users’ sense of trust or security.

             Additionally, in the collection of the data, it was found that 42.6 percent of the participants visit hospitals and healthcare facilities often. The high percentage shows the representation of the South African population where a large population of the people visit the hospitals every once in a while. The integration of the view of this group into the research shows the possibility of effectively capturing the views, experiences, and thoughts of the users of the EHR services while integrated to Cloud. That the questionnaire-based interviewing data collection technique identifies this group as the largest in percentage and their conversance with the healthcare system after receiving services several times. This group has a greater understanding of the general services offered and can offer perceptions and thoughts and allow the research to capture them effectively. The incorporation of the ideas into the research makes it possible to outlines the key issues under study in this research. 

 

Frequency Table of visit to Public Healthcare Services

Number of Times

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Never

7

14.9

14.9

Rarely

16

34.0

48.9

Sometimes

20

42.6

91.5

Often

4

8.5

100.0

Very Often

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

The representation of the population in terms of access to and use of healthcare services is as shown in the bar graph outlined below. The integration of the graph offers an elaborative and visual description of the data in percentages.

4.4 The Importance of Medical History in the Provision of Healthcare Services

            Outlining the importance of the medical history in the provision of healthcare services is critical to determining the necessity of the application of the EHR system and its integration to cloud. The determination of the importance of the medical history of the patient was done by integrating the perspective of the participants on whether or not they believe the healthcare providers required their medical history before the delivery of healthcare services. The question was phrased to inquire “whether healthcare providers are interested in knowing one’s medical history.” According to more than a half of the participants (57.4%), healthcare providers show significant interest in the medical history of the patients. The providers want to understand the medical history of the patients before administering health services. One sure way of acquiring the medical history knowledge of a patient is through access to the patient’s records. The integrated EHR in cloud allows the storage of the medical history of the patients and easy, convenient, and safe retrieval of the information when required for the provision of other medical services in the future.

            Additionally, while answering the same question, other participants offered different answers. 21.3% of the participants asserted that the providers of healthcare are not interested in the medical history of the patients before the delivery of healthcare services. Moreover, a similar percentage (21.3%) of  interviewed respondents demonstrated the lack of knowledge as to whether the providers of healthcare services require the medical history of the patient before the provision of the services. The integration of the responses and information from the data would be critical in determining the importance of the EHR system in the improvement of the quality, efficiency, and safety of healthcare. Additionally, applying the data collected essential in outlining how the users of the technology perceive or think about its storage of the medical history and its ability to allow access conveniently and faster to the healthcare providers when needed.

Table of whether healthcare providers are interested in knowing one’s medical history

Responses

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

27

57.4

57.4

No

10

21.3

78.7

I Don’t Know

10

21.3

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

The responses of the participants regarding whether the medical history of patient was essential to the service providers are presented in the following pie chart to enhance the understanding of the experiences of the participants and the importance of the integrated EHR.

A pie-chart representation of whether healthcare providers are interested in knowing the medical history of the patients in the provision of healthcare services.

It can be argued that the respondents who do not know whether the healthcare institutions need these information might imply that they lack knowledge of the falure of such information. It educated on the value of such information, their responses are likely to differ.

4.5 Information Required in Healthcare Facilities

            Some of the key objectives of the healthcare system is the provision of quality, safe, and efficient healthcare services. The achievement of success in the process relies greatly on gathering and using information effectively. The researcher understood this aspect of the healthcare services and honoured it through the inclusion of an important part of the research questions that require the participant to outline some of the required information in receiving healthcare in the healthcare facilities. One of the questions was whether the providers required the medical history of the patient in the provision of healthcare. 28.6% stated that the medical history was essential in the provision of the quality, efficient, and safer healthcare services. The integration of the part opened up the ground for asking other questions that outline other requirements. Further questions focused on identifying other requirements in the provision of healthcare in Durban and South Africa. These requirements include the details of the physical examination, treatment details, health evaluation, residence and other personal details.

            The findings of the data collection show that the 11.4% of the participants believed that the details of physical examination were required for effectiveness in the provision of healthcare services. While this is the case, healthcare evaluation, treatment details, proof of residence, and personal details were required in healthcare facilities in the percentage of 1.4%, 4.3%, 14.3%, and 40% respectively. The priority placed on the personal details and the medical history of the user of the healthcare services shows the great of offering the healthcare providers the necessary information and details to ensure efficacy in the delivery of the services. Using the information and data collected in this section allows a better understanding of the importance of the EHR system in the provision of the services. It further promotes the understanding of the importance of integrating the system to cloud for easing the processes of storing and retrieving the critical patient information. Such details such as personal details, residence, medical history, and physical examination form a critical part of the healthcare provision process and, therefore, the need for effective storage. 

Frequencies Distribution of Information Required In Healthcare Facilities

Information Required In Healthcare Facilities

Responses

Percentage of cases

Counts

Percent

Medical history

20

28.6

42.6

Details of physical examination

8

11.4

17.0

Healthcare evaluation

1

1.4

2.1

Treatment details

3

4.3

6.4

Proof of residence

10

14.3

21.3

Personal details

28

40.0

59.6

Total

70

100.0

148.9

 

The contribution of the participants in developing an understanding of the requirements of the healthcare facilities is crucial in identifying the criticality of an integrated EHR and in advancing access to the information by the healthcare providers for the improvement of healthcare services. The importance of some of the requirements as shown by the high percentages demonstrates the need for directing focus on the specific areas and using the participants to determine the issues that influence their sense of trust security. People want to hold on to their medical history, physical examination, and personal details and thus the concern in adopting and using any technology that poses the risk of breaching the confidentiality or the privacy is a central issue in this research.

4.6 Electronic Information Storage

Understanding the respondents’ willingness to use the electronic systems for the storage of medical information is essential in understanding the need whole system. The willingness of the users to apply the electronic system defines their perception of the system. While some respondents were willing to shift from the conventional methods to better and more efficient electronic platforms, others showed reluctance in using the technologies for security and confidentiality issues. The assessment of the respondents’ willingness shows the challenges users of the EHR may face including their perception and views in relation to their sense of security and trust of a cloud-integrated EHR system. The findings of the willingness showed that 85.1% of the respondents are willing to store medical information electronically for effective use in the provision of healthcare services. While this is the case, 4.3% of the respondents demonstrated the unwillingness of using the electronic systems for the storage of their health and medical information. Of the 47 respondents, three (representing 6.4%) and two (representing 4.3%) stated that they were uncertain of using the electronic systems or gave no response to the matter respectively. The integration of the data in the analysis of the factors influencing the consumer’s sense of security/trust will offer a better understanding of the topic.

A Frequency Distribution of Respondents’ willingness  have  their medical information stored electronically by healthcare providers

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

40

85.1

85.0

No

2

4.3

89.4

I Do Not Know

3

6.4

95.8

No Response

2

4.3

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

The pie-chart presentation of the results appears as shown in the following pie diagram.

4.7 Confidentiality in Handling Healthcare Information

            One of the key elements in the management of the patient information is the consideration of confidentiality in the process. Patients are protected by the privacy and confidentiality regulations that if broken result in a breach of the patient’s right to privacy and confidentiality. Keeping personal healthcare information confidential is, therefore, an important step in ensuring the provision of quality and efficient healthcare services. According to the findings of this research, 91.5% of the respondents demonstrated the importance of the element of confidentiality in the provision of service by stating that they would like the confidentiality of their personal healthcare information. The confidentiality of the personal health information is therefore considered one of the key aspects that ensure the patient satisfaction. The data collected further shows that only 6.4% of the respondents do not consider the element of confidentiality as critical in influencing the provision of healthcare services. Moreover, 2.1% of the respondents do not know whether they consider healthcare information confidentiality essential in the provision of healthcare services.

Keeping personal healthcare information confidential

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

43

91.5

91.5

No

3

6.4

97.9

Don’t Know

1

2.1

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

The pie-representation of the findings concerning the confidentiality is as depicted in the following pie diagram.

            Further, the interest of users of cloud-integrated EHR system have differing interests on the aspect of confidentiality. Most people perceive confidentiality as critical in the management of patient information. The study indicates that different respondents demonstrated different perceptions about confidentiality. However, most of the respondents (68.1%) showed a great interest on confidentiality by asserting that they required the handling and management of the healthcare information systems and records to be very confidential and protect the privacy of the people who would not wish any other unauthorized persons to have access to personal and medical history information. Additionally, 29.1% of the respondents required the process of information management and handling personal patient information to be confidential. Attaching confidentiality in the management of the patient’s information may influence the users’ sense of trust. Only 2.1% of the respondents stated that they would like the information management to be ‘somewhat confidential’ to enjoy the services offered by the electronic system. Nevertheless, all respondents showed concern about confidentiality in the provision of healthcare services.

Showing respondents’ interest on confidentiality

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Somewhat Confidential

1

2.1

2.1

Confidential

14

29.8

31.9

Very Confidential

32

68.1

100.0

I don’t really care

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

The following bar graph represents the respondents’ views of confidentiality in the handling of patients’ healthcare information. People want somewhat confidential, confidential, and the very confidential management of their healthcare and medical records using the cloud-integrated EHR system as shown in the bar chart shown.

4.8 Management of Electronic Health Information

            When asked whether they would welcome the idea of electronic healthcare information management, 51.1% of the respondents gave a positive response while 17.0% said they would be unwilling to welcome such as idea. Moreover, over 29.8% argued that they did not know the value of the integration. The respondents gave their concerns for arguing against the integrated healthcare such as the possibility of compromised autonomy (12.8%), fear of possible identity theft (29.8%), unauthorized access (14.9%), breach of confidentiality (14.9%), and the existence of security limitations (23.4). Additionally, only 5.0% do not support the electronic management of health data. 22.3%, 10.7%, 21%, and 17% of the respondents assert that cloud-integrated EHR system allows easy retrieval in future, improves access to and use of insurance, allows the effective treatment in cases of emergency, and reduces the time for the collection of the details respectively. Further, 19.0% of the respondents asserted that the application of the technology improves the quality of healthcare services.

4.9 Digital Medical Records and Respondents’ Knowledge of Cloud Security System

            In the determination of the attitudes, perceptions, thoughts, and experiences, checking the respondents’ understanding of the digital medical records and the cloud-integrated EHR is important. The respondents show the importance of digital management of records by stating that the technology in essential in addressing medical emergencies (76.6%) and saving pre-admission administrative time (23.4%). The data collected shows that 63.8% know about cloud while 36.2% do not know about the system.

Reasons for Digital Medical Records

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

In case of medical emergency e.g. accidents

36

76.6

76.6

To save pre-admission administrative time

11

23.4

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Have knowledge of Security System of Cloud?

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

I know about Cloud

30

63.8

63.8

I do not know about Cloud

17

36.2

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

4.10 Ethical Concerns

            Ethical concerns surround the application of the electronic information management techniques. Some users have raised ethical concerns about the breach of confidentiality in using the technology. The study showed that 23.8%, 23.8%, and 19.8% of the respondents were concerned about the access of personal information without authorization, use of data without the consent of the patient, and using data for other secondary issues as some of the major ethical issues in dealing with integrated EHR. Moreover, while 100% of the respondents argued for the storage of healthcare information on a database to allow reuse in future, the concerns mentioned cannot be ignored. 

Ethical issues associated with linking medical records digitally

Responses

Percentage of cases

Counts

Percent

Possibility of third party access to confidential health data

24

23.8

51.1

Use of data without my consent

24

23.8

51.1

Use of the data for other non-health related purposes e.g. to medical aid scheme companies

20

19.8

42.6

I would not disclose all information if the data is going to be linked digitally

2

2.0

4.3

Leaking of medical information

17

16.8

36.2

Theft of medical information

14

13.9

29.8

Total

101

100.0

214.9

 

            The consent of the patient should be sought before authorizing the access and use of personal information. This research found that 76.6% of the respondents stated that there was a need to seek the consent of the user while 12.8% say there is no need. Moreover, on the issue of consent, 10.6% posit that the institution should consider what is good for the user and institution and does not require the consent of the user.

Should Consent be sought?

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

36

76.6

76.6

No

6

12.8

89.4

Whatever is good for the healthcare intuition

5

10.6

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Chapter Summary

                The findings presented in this chapter are critical for the development of the research and the determination of the factors that influence the users’ sense of trust and security in using the cloud-integrated EHR system. People have various and different thoughts, perception, experiences, and concerns. The consideration of all these elements is essential for the development of an articulate study. The different questions used to outline and capture the experiences/thoughts/perceptions, and concerns facing users in the study are clear and straight-forward to minimize confusion. The results/findings will be used in the analysis and discussion chapter for in-depth discussion and analysis.

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter V

5.0 Analysis and Conclusion

5.1 Introduction

5.1.1 Critique of the Adopted Approach

            The research applies the qualitative research method. The method proves effective in identifying and capturing the users’ perceptions, attitudes, thoughts, and experiences while using the cloud-integrated EHR system. The application of the method allows the integration of different research techniques such as specific research paradigms and philosophies that enhance the efficiency in collecting and analysing data and information. The interpretivist and positivist paradigms enable comprehensive analysis. Most importantly, however, the qualitative method applies data collection techniques that are effective in collecting information for this study. Using the interview method that incorporates effective questionnaire-based interviewing makes it possible for the researcher to outline and capture the attitudes/perspectives/thoughts and experiences of the respondents. The integration of the method made it possible to capture the different aspects and analyse them effectively using content analysis, which ascertains extensive discussion and analysis of the findings. The method applied in the research attaches credibility and dependability of the research.

            Additionally, the qualitative research method applies the random sampling method and the interview method, which though effective, may pose significant challenges in conducting the research. The application of the random sampling technique allowed ease in selecting the participants. However, it led to under-representation of the older generation (40+ years) which comprised of only 2.1% of the participants. This may result in ineffectiveness in capturing the concerns and the factors that affect people beyond 40 years. Additionally, while the interview method used ensures the collection of primary information and captures the different issues under study effectively, it offers research challenges. The data collection method allows room for subjectivity. The interviews were time-consuming. The process of selecting, setting up, and interviewing the respondents required time and incurred costs. 

5.2 Analysis of the Findings

            The study finds that most of the users’ of the cloud-integrated EHR system are the young people between 16 and 40 years. The finding aligns with the population distribution of SA where the highest percentage of people lies below 40 years. The cumulative percentage of respondents below 40 years is 97.9%. The respondents place certainty in capturing and understanding the factors that affect this group’s sense of trust and security in using the electronic system integrated to cloud. The percentage of people above 40 years represented in the research is 2.1% placing doubt on the fair representation of the group. According to Davis (2012) and Langston (2015), the older generation visits hospitals more following old age, reducing effectiveness of the immune system, and trust on the healthcare providers. Using the 2.1% to outline the concerns, opinions, experiences, and perception was ambitious and to a certain extent ineffective in outlining the issues that influence the sense of trust and security among users who are older (40+).

            According to Langston (2015) and Davis (2012), older people are more likely to have trust and security concerns when using new technologies owing to the difficult to change and adopt technology. The older generation users of the EHR are mostly disdainful of the technology and often term it insecure in handling critical information. While this is the case, most young people view technology as critical and efficient. Therefore, more are likely to perceive the cloud-integrated EHR system as effective and consider using it despite the existing concerns of mistrust and insecurity(Ashibani & Mahmoud, 2017). Nonetheless, the incorporation of views and experiences from all age groups in the study is essential for the development of a comprehensive research. 

Access to healthcare facilities and the medical history of the patient are essential for the provision of healthcare(Sinha, et al., 2013). Seeking healthcare services places the user of the services at an elevated ground for understanding and determining the quality of the services, forming views and experiences. People who rarely or never visit healthcare facilities can only formulate perceptions from the experiences of others or secondary sources. The results shows that more than 50% of the respondents visit hospitals and other healthcare facilities often/sometimes. The results translate to a high acceptability and accessibility of the healthcare services in Durban and broadly, South Africa. Frequent visits to the facilities asserts that the services are highly accessible and acceptable. The WHO (2010) and SA News (2014)support the argument by stating that the Government of South Africa has dedicated significant resources towards the improvement of the health sector and enhance accessibility and acceptability. The provision of the national health insurance scheme, according to the WHO report, facilitates the provision of universal coverage and promotes efficiency and effectiveness in delivering healthcare services thus improving accessibility and acceptability. The reflection is evident in the findings (WHO, 2010).

The medical history of a patient is critical in the provision of healthcare services. According to Schuman (2017), Health IT (2017), and Amatayakul and Amatayakul (2013), the healthcare professionals need the history to make informed decisions in the provision of services to the patient. The history is, therefore, essential for the enhancement of the quality, efficiency, and safety of the services offered(Duffy, 2010). Health IT (2017)states that the EHR system is critical for the provision of up-to-date, accurate, and full patient information. The system enables faster access to the records of the patients and the coordination of care thus ensuring efficiency(Lorenzi, et al., 2009). The findings of this study show that most respondents (57.4%) view medical history as essential to the provision of care. The study supports existing literature that terms the storage of patient information using the EHR important for quality improvement, efficient and safer healthcare services. 

Ozair, et al.(2015) and Steele (2016)argue that the storage of the patient information and health history using the EHR system allows the healthcare providers to retrieve the information at the point of care. The integration of the health history in the provision of care services improves effectiveness of the diagnosis, reduces medical and care errors, and enhances safety(Houser, et al., 2012). Further, the storage of information using the EHR system attaches certainty in the provision of accurate information about the patient. The study shows the importance of the personal information and the use of the EHR (85.1% of respondents are willing to use EHR). The information enhances convenience, effective communication, efficiency, safer and reliable prescription, and a higher quality of care (Health IT, 2017). The percentage also shows that a small percentage of people do not trust or have issues with the EHR system’s security.

Confidentiality and privacy are critical rights in healthcare provision that protect other rights and values such as respect, patient dignity, sense of self-worth, and ethical care among others. Rodrigues, et al.(2016) point out that privacy, security, and confidentiality are the obligation of professionals who deal with patient records. Handling and managing patient records requires the consideration of patient rights in regards to privacy, security, and confidentiality. The study shows similar concern since more than 91.5% of patients require confidentiality and privacy. Additionally, approximately 51.1% of patients in Durban would like the integration of the EHR to cloud for effective management and use of their records in the acquisition/provision of healthcare services. The percentage shows the importance of effective management of patient records and the elements of confidentiality, privacy, and security.

The response to the EHR integration to cloud and application of the technology to manage patient records requires an in-depth understanding of EHR and cloud. Bell and Thornton (2011)argue that most people opposing or showing reluctance on the grounds of security and trust show minimal understanding of the system. Only 63.8% know about cloud while 36.2% do not. The finding of the research is backed by Sermeus, et al.(2016) and Kumar and Bauer (2011) who argue that the creation of awareness would improve people’s perception and thoughts about the innovation. An informed society would adopt and use the cloud-integrated EHR system since it enhances efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of healthcare services and improve quality and safety. Moreover, negative perception from informed people would require enlightening the people of the security of the system and the safety of the information therein.

5.3 Overall Conclusion

            The EHR system has enhanced efficiency, effectiveness, quality improvement, safety, and healthcare improvement in South Africa. However, concerns remain adamant among some of the current and potential users of cloud-integrated EHR system about the security of the system. The importance of privacy, confidentiality, and security are some of the fundamental elements that patients consider when it comes to their information and health history(Jawhari, et al., 2016)(Health IT, 2017). Patients want to feel secure and know that they can trust the system to manage their information effectively and prevent unauthorized access and use of their health information and personal details (Alabdulatif, et al., 2013: Ajami & Baqheri-Tadi, 2013). The components affect the implementation of the EHR system, especially with integration to cloud. The study demonstrates the extent of the influence of users’ perceptions, thoughts, and experiences about the system on the implementation process. However, it is clear that most of the young population view the system as critical to the enhancement of the efficiency, quality, and safety of healthcare services. Using the technology minimizes time wastage, improves information management, reduces unauthorized access/use, and reduces medical errors significantly(Amatayakul & Amatayakul, 2013; Gavrilov & Trajkovik, 2012; Goldberg, et al., 2012).

            The study meets the research objectives and answers the questions by studying and offering articulate discussion of the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust. Capturing the users’ perception, experiences, and thoughts through the integration of the interview method to enhance the effectiveness of the phenomenological qualitative research allows efficacy in answering the questions of the factors, effect on implementation, and possible implications on healthcare.

5.4 Limitations of the Study

            The method applied in the conduction of the research ensured effectiveness and allowed the incorporation of first-hand and credible information. The different techniques used for data collection, presentation, and analysis ascertain the production of quality, comprehensive, articulate and credible research. However, the study has a few limitations. The inability to determine the sincerity of the respondents and the accuracy of the information makes it difficult to say with certainty that the information or data they provided was 100% accurate. For instance, it would have been easy for a respondent to lie about understanding EHR or cloud. Additionally, the random sampling technique made it difficult to balance the participants from different age groups and regions. Further, generalizations are made to ensure the representation of the South African Durban communities, but the results may not reflect the entire community accurately.

5.5 Opportunities for Further Research

            The research on the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in using cloud-integrated EHR system opens up the topic as an active area of research. Further research is critical to outlining the issues in-depth. Research on the security of the system and the consideration of the elements of confidentiality, privacy, and patient rights can facilitate enhanced understanding of the topic. Additionally, further research can integrate specific parameters such as age and discuss the same topic with a particular focus on people over 50 years. This would consider the fact that currently there exist an informational/technological gap between the elderly and the young. Generalizations of results may not represent the entire South African population and thus the need for researching further on the factors that influence the perceptions of people over 50 concerning the cloud-integrated EHR system.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

Ajami, S. & Baqheri-Tadi, T., 2013. Barriers for Adopting Electronic Health Records (EHRs) by Physicians. Acta Informatica Medica, 21 (2), pp. 129-134.

Alabdulatif, A., Khalil, I. & Mai, V., 2013. Protection of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in Cloud. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 4191-4194.

Amatayakul, M. & Amatayakul, M. K., 2013. Electronic health records : a practical guide for professionals and organizations. Chicago, IL: American Health Information Management Association.

AORN, 2013. In Focus: Incorporating clinical decision support into EHRs. AORN Journal, 98(4), pp. C7-C8.

Ashibani, Y. & Mahmoud, Q. H., 2017. Cyber physical systems security: analysis, challenges and solutions. Computers & Security.

Bazeley, P., 2013. Qualitative data analysis : practical strategies. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications .

Belk, R. W., 2006. Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bell, B. & Thornton, K., 2011. From promise to reality achieving the value of an EHR. Healthcare Financial Management, 65(2), pp. 51-56.

Check, J. & Schutt, R. K., 2011. Research Methods in Education. London: SAGE Publications.

Chen, Y., Lu, J. & Jan, J., 2012. A secure EHR system based on hybrid clouds. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(5), pp. 3375-3384.

Coats, B. & Acharya, S., 2014. Leveraging the Cloud for Electronic Health Record Access. Perspectives In Health Information Management, pp. 1-19.

Coyle, A. & Lyons, E., 2013. Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. New York: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Çuhadar, C., 2014. Information Technologies Pre-service Teachers' Acceptance of Tablet PCs as an Innovative Learning Tool. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (2), pp. 741-753.

Danis, M., 2012. Clinical research consultation: a casebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Darko-Yawson, S. & Ellingsen, G., 2016. Assessing and Improving EHRs Data Quality through a Socio-technical Approach. Procedia Computer Science, Volume 98, pp. 243-250.

Davis, D., 2012. Our Aging Population and Health Care: Perspectives on Health IT. [Online]
Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/consumer/aging-population-health-care-perspectives-health/
[Accessed 27 June 2017].

Deshmukh, P., 2016. Design of cloud security in the EHR for Indian healthcare services. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences .

Duckert, J. & Rose, A. D., 2013. Embracing the EHR's challenges and benefits. Grace Award winner reviews EHR implementation best practices. Journal of AHIMA, 84(2), pp. 42-43.

Duffy, L., 2010. Effects of electronic prescribing on the clinical practice of a family medicine residency. Fam Med, 42(5), pp. 358-363.

Elkhenini, H. F. et al., 2015. Using an electronic medical record (EMR) to conduct clinical trials: Salford Lung Study feasibility. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 15(1), pp. 1-10.

Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Señor, I. C., Lozoya, P. Á. O. & Toval, A., 2013. Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(3), p. 541–562.

Gavrilov, G. & Trajkovik, V., 2012. Security and Privacy Issues and Requirements for Healthcare Cloud Computing. [Online]
Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.403.8984&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[Accessed 9 May 2017].

Goldberg, D. et al., 2012. EHRs in Primary Care Practices: Benefits, Challenges and Successful Strategies. The American Journal of Managed Care, 18(2), pp. e48-e54.

Hays, D. G. & Singh, A. A., 2012. Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. New York: Guilford Press.

Health IT, 2017. Health Care Quality & Convenience. [Online]
Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/health-care-quality-convenience
[Accessed 2 May 2017].

Health IT, 2017. What are the advantages of electronic health records?. [Online]
Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/faqs/what-are-advantages-electronic-health-records
[Accessed 28 June 2017].

Hoonaard, W. C. v. d. & Hamilton, A., 2016. Ethics rupture : exploring alternatives to formal research-ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Houser, S. H., Colquitt, S., Clements, K. & Hart-Hester, S., 2012. The Impact of Electronic Health Record Usage on Cancer Registry Systems in Alabama. Perspectives In Health Information Management, pp. 1-15.

Jawhari, B. et al., 2016. Barriers and facilitators to Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use in an urban slum. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 94, pp. 246-254.

Jost, M., Nilakanta, R. & Willis, J., 2012. Qualitative research methods for education and instructional technology. Greenwich: Information Age.

Keenan, L. et al., 2016. Benefits and challenges of EMR implementations in low resource settings: a state-of-the-art review. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, pp. 161-12.

Kelley, T., 2016. Electronic health records for quality nursing & health care. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.

Khan, J. A., 2012. Research methodology. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.

Kuada, J. E., 2012. Research methodology: a project guide for university students. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

Kumar, S. & Bauer, K., 2011. The business case for implementing electronic health records in primary care settings in the United States. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 10(2), pp. 119-131.

Langston, C., 2015. Making Electronic Health Records Responsive to Needs of Older Adults (Really Meaningful Use). [Online]
Available at: http://www.johnahartford.org/blog/view/making-electronic-health-records-responsive-to-needs-of-older-adults-really/
[Accessed 27 June 2017].

Lorenzi, N. M., Kouroubali, A., Detmer, D. E. & Bloomrosen, M., 2009. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 9(1), pp. 1-13.

Lyu, C. et al., 2016. Privacy-preserving data sharing scheme over cloud for social applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 74, pp. 44-55.

Mirza, H. & El-Masri, S., 2012. Cloud Computing System for Integrated Electronic Health Records. [Online]
Available at: http://worldcomp-proceedings.com/proc/p2012/BIC4644.pdf
[Accessed 6 May 2017].

Niles, N. J., 2017. Navigating the U.S. health care system. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Ozair, F. F., Jamshed, N., Sharma, A. & Aggarwa, P., 2015. Ethical issues in electronic health records: A general overview. Perspectives in Clinical Research , 6(2), pp. 73-76.

Rodrigues, J. J. P., Compte, S. S. & Diez, I. d. l. T., 2016. Security and Privacy in e-Health Applications over the Cloud. e-Health Systems - Theory, Advances and Technical Applications, pp. 209-226.

Rodrigues, J. J., Torre, I. d. l., Fernández, G. & López-Coronado, M., 2013. Analysis of the Security and Privacy Requirements of Cloud-Based Electronic Health Records Systems. Journal of Meedical Internet Research, 15(8), p. 186.

Roehrs, A., Costa, C. A. d., Righi, R. d. R. & Oliveira, K. S. F. d., 2017. Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19 (1), p. 13.

Rubin, A. & Babbie, E. R., 2011. Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage.

Russo, G. A., 2016. When Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Talk, Everyone Can Win: Our Experience Creating a Software Link Between Hospital and Radiation Oncology EHRs. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 94(1), pp. 206-207.

SA News, 2014. Great improvements in access to healthcare services. [Online]
Available at: www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/great-improvements-access-healthcare-services-0
[Accessed 28 June 2017].

Schuman, A. J., 2017. Improve your practice: Facilitate patient access. Contemporary Pediatrics, 34(1), pp. 34-36.

Sermeus, W., Proctor, P. M. & Weber, P., 2016. Nursing informatics 2016: eHealth for all : every level collaboration, from project to realization. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.

Sinha, P. K. et al., 2013. Electronic health record: standards, coding systems, frameworks, and infrastructures. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

Speziale, H. S. & Carpenter, D. R., 2011. Qualitative research in nursing : advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Stair, R. & Reynolds, G., 2016. Fundamentals of Information Systems. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Steele, E., 2016. EHR implementation: who benefits, who pays?. Health Management Technology, 27 (7), p. 44.

Subashini, S. & Kavitha, V., 2011. A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34 (1), pp. 1-11.

UNFPA, 2017. Young People. [Online]
Available at: http://southafrica.unfpa.org/en/topics/young-people-1

Wang, S.-L.et al., 2016. Design and evaluation of a cloud-based Mobile Health Information Recommendation system on wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 49, pp. 221-235.

WHO, 2010. Bridging the gap in South Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(11), pp. 797-876.

Wickramasinghe, N., 2016. Handbook of Research on Healthcare Administration and Management. New York: IGI Global.

Young, K. M., Kroth, P. J. & Sultz, H. A., 2017. Sultz & Young's health care USA: understanding its organization and delivery. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

 

APPENDICES

Appendıx A. Questionnaire

 

Date 8 June 2017

 

Dear research participant, I am a student undertaking my masters research thesis in the Salford Business School at the University of Salford. As part of my course I am undertaking a research study titled: Factors Affecting the Users’ Sense of Security and Trust in Integrating Electronic Health RecordTO CLOUD.

The Electronic Health Records (HER) offers a patient-centered recording of patient information and allows easier access and retrieval of the information by authorized users. In the recent past, the continued integration of EHR to Cloud promises a more efficient, easier, and cheaper management of the information. It also poses various concerns, which continue to limit implementation in the healthcare system. The users’ sense of security and trust are major concerns in the implementation of a Cloud-based EHR. Therefore, there is a need for investigating the factors that influence the users’ sense of security and trust in order to develop a better understanding of the issue and formulate effective measures of addressing it.

 

I can assure you that any data collected will remain confidential. I have gained ethical approval for the study from the University of Salford

My research is supervised by

 

Yours sincerely

Mr Lloyd E Johnson

Contact email:  lloydits@gmail.com

 


Appendix B

Research Participant Consent Form

Title of Project: Factors Affecting the Users’ Sense of Security and Trust in Integrating Electronic Health RecordTO CLOUD

 

Name of Researcher: Lloyd E Johnson

Name of Supervisor: Prof Steve Page

                                                                                                              

Ø  I confirm that I have read and understood the information sheet for the above study and what my contribution will be.

 

Yes

 

No

                                                                                   

Ø  I have been given the opportunity to ask questions (face to face, via telephone and e-mail)

 

Yes

 

No

 

Ø  I agree to take part in the interview

 

 

Yes

 

No

 

NA

 

Ø  I agree to the interview being tape recorded

 

 

Yes

 

No

 

NA

 

Ø  I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I can

      withdraw from the research at any time without giving any reason

 

Yes

 

No

 

Ø  I agree to take part in the above study

 

 

Yes

 

No

 

Name of participant

 

 

Signature

 

 

 

Date

 

 

 

Name of researcher:Lloyd E Johnson

 

 

 

 

Researcher’s e-mail address:  lloydits@gmail.com

 

 

 

 


Research Questionnaire and Interview Schedule

Appendix C

 

1.      Please indicate your city of residence

a.       Durban

b.      Cape Town

c.       Johannesburg

d.      Pretoria

e.       Other (please specify)…………………………………

 

2.      Which of the age groups below do you fall under?

 

a.       10-15

b.      16-20

c.       21-25

d.      26-30

e.       31-35

f.        36 – 40

g.      41 – 45

f.        46 and above

 

3.      How often do you use the hospital or public healthcare service?

a.       Never

b.      Rarely

c.       Sometimes

d.      Often

e.       Very often

 

4.      Do you think healthcare workers are interested in knowing about your medical history?

a.       Yes

b.      No

c.       I don’t know

 

5.      Which of the following information are you required to provide in healthcare facilities before you can be attended to? (tick all that apply)

a.       Medical history

b.      Details of physical examination

c.       Healthcare evaluation

d.      Treatment details

e.       Proof of residence

f.        Personal details

 

6.      How important is your personal health information to the healthcare providers?

a.       Not sure

b.      Not important

c.       Somewhat important

d.      Important

e.       Very important

f.        Utmost important

 

 

7.      Would you like your medical information to be stored electronically and available for future use by the healthcare officials?

a.       Yes

b.      No

c.       I do not know

d.      Provide reasons for your answer

 

8.      Do you think your personal healthcare information should be kept confidential?

a.       Yes

b.      No

c.       Don’t know

 

9.      If you think your personal health information should be kept confidential, how confidential should it be kept?

a.       Somewhat confidential

b.      Confidential

c.       Very confidential

d.      I don’t really care

 

10.  Do you think your healthcare information should be stored on a database to be reused in case you revisit the health centre?

a.       Yes

b.      No

 

 

11.  Do you think that your consent should be sought by the medical care institutions before your personal health data are integrated into an electronic system?

a.       Yes

b.      No

c.       Whatever is good for the healthcare institutions

 

12.  If yes, would you agree to giving or signing consent?

a.       Yes

b.      No

 

13.  How do you think your medical record should be managed for optimal use?

a.       It Should be manually captured and stored in files

b.      It should be electronically managed for easy retrieval and future use

 

14.  Would you prefer for your healthcare information to be managed by the hospital or by an independent third party organization?

a.       To be managed by the healthcare provider

b.      To be managed by an independent organization

 

 

15.  Give reasons for your response to question number 13 above?

 

 

 

 

 

16.  How would you feel if your electronic health data was integrated into an electronic system e.g.  Cloud and managed by a third-party ICT organization?

a.       I would welcome the initiative

b.      I will not welcome the initiative

c.       I do not know the value of such integration

 

 

17.  What do you think would be the disadvantage of integrating your health data into an electronic system?

a.       My autonomy might be compromised

b.      I fear that the information can be used for identity theft

c.       I fear that the information can be access by

d.      Other people might find out confidential information about my health status

e.       The system might have some security limitations

 

18.  Which of the following reasons would you like your healthcare data to be managed electronically? (please tick all that apply)

a.       I do not support electronic management of my health data

b.      For easy retrieval against my future visit to the hospital

c.       For health insurance purposes

d.      For cases of emergency where I cannot provide the data before treatment

e.       Reduced time needed for collecting these details all the time

f.        Easy access by the click of a button.

g.      Improved quality healthcare administration

 

 

19.  For which of the following reasons would you support that your medical record be digital and accessible and linked to more than one healthcare facility?

a.       In case of medical emergency e.g. accidents

b.      To save pre-admission administrative time

 

20.  What do you think would be the ethical issues associated with linking medical records digitally? (please tick all that apply)

a.       Possibility of third party access to confidential health data

b.      Use of data without my consent

c.       Use of the data for other non-health related purposes e.g. to medical aid scheme companies

d.      I would not disclose all information if the data is going to be linked digitally

e.       Leaking of medical information

f.        Theft of medical information.

 

 

21.  In the case of information leak, what measures would you suggest be taken?

a.       The service providers should accept liability in case of any bridge

b.      I should be contacted immediately to alert me of the information leak

c.       I don’t need to be informed

 

22.  Would like to be informed about the third party managing the system

What do you know about the security system of Cloud?

a.       I know about Cloud

b.      I do not know about Cloud

 

 

 

Question number

1.      How important is the EHR on the quality and safety in healthcare provision?

2.      As a user of the EHR system, how effective do you find it?

3.      What is your perception or attitude towards the use of the EHR when integrated to Cloud?

4.      What do you think influences your sense of security and trust in using the Cloud-integrated EHR system? How does it affect your willingness to use the system?

5.      What do you think can be done to improve your perception and attitude towards the use of an EHR system integrated to Cloud?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATA ANALYSIS REPORT APPENDIX D

Question 1

Frequency Table of Place of Residence

City of Residence

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Durban

37

78.7

78.7

Cape Town

2

4.3

83.0

Johannesburg

1

2.1

85.1

Pretoria

2

4.3

89.4

Other City

5

10.6

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

A Contingency table of Age groups and place of residence

Age Group

City of Residence

Durban

Cape Town

Johannesburg

Pretoria

Other City

Total

16-20

0

0

1

0

2

3

21-25

11

2

0

0

3

16

26-30

9

0

0

2

0

11

31-35

6

0

0

0

0

6

36-40

10

0

0

0

0

10

41-45

1

0

0

0

0

1

46+

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

37

2

1

2

5

47

 

Question 2

Frequency Table of Age Groups

Age Groups

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

16-20

3

6.4

6.4

21-25

16

34.0

40.4

26-30

11

23.4

63.8

31-35

6

12.8

76.6

36-40

10

21.3

97.9

41-45

1

2.1

100.0

46+

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

Question 3

Frequency Table of visit to Hospitals or Public Healthcare Services

Number of Times

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Never

7

14.9

14.9

Rarely

16

34.0

48.9

Sometimes

20

42.6

91.5

Often

4

8.5

100.0

Very Often

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

A Contingency table of Number of Visits to Healthcare Services and place of residence

Visits

City of Residence

Durban

Cape Town

Johannesburg

Pretoria

Other City

Total

Never

3

0

0

2

2

7

Rarely

14

0

1

0

1

16

Sometimes

16

2

0

0

2

20

Often

4

0

0

0

0

4

Very Often

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

37

2

1

2

5

47

 

 

 

Question 4

Frequency Table of whether healthcare providers are interested in knowing one’s medical history

Responses

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

27

57.4

57.4

No

10

21.3

78.7

I Don’t Know

10

21.3

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

Question 5

Frequencies Distribution of Information Required In Healthcare Facilities

 

Information Required In Healthcare Facilities

Responses

Percentage of cases

Counts

Percent

Medical history

20

28.6

42.6

Details of physical examination

8

11.4

17.0

Healthcare evaluation

1

1.4

2.1

Treatment details

3

4.3

6.4

Proof of residence

10

14.3

21.3

Personal details

28

40.0

59.6

Total

70

100.0

148.9

 

 

Question 6

A Frequency Distribution on the perceptions of patient’s health information to healthcare provider

Degrees of Certainty

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Not Sure

13

27.7

27.7

Not important

2

4.3

31.9

Somewhat Important

6

12.8

44.7

Important

13

27.7

72.3

Very Important

11

23.4

95.7

Utmost Important

2

4.3

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Question 7

A Frequency Distribution of Respondents willingness stored their medical information electronically by healthcare providers

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

40

85.1

85.0

No

2

4.3

89.4

I Do Not Know

3

6.4

95.8

No Response

2

4.3

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question 8

A Frequency Distribution concerning keeping personal healthcare information confidential

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

43

91.5

91.5

No

3

6.4

97.9

Don’t Know

1

2.1

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

Question 9

Showing respondents’ interest on confidentiality

 

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Somewhat Confidential

1

2.1

2.1

Confidential

14

29.8

31.9

Very Confidential

32

68.1

100.0

I don’t really care

0

0.0

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

A Contingency table on level of confidentiality required by respondents and confidentiality on healthcare information

confidentiality on healthcare information

 

Level of Confidentiality

Total

Somewhat Confidential

Confidential

Very Confidential

 

Yes

0

12

31

43

No

0

2

1

3

Don’t Know

1

0

0

1

Total

1

14

32

47

 

Question 10

Here, it says that, out of 47 respondents, they all reported that their healthcare information should be stored on a database to be reused in case of revisit to healthcare facility.

Question 11

Frequency Table

Should Consent be sorted?

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

36

76.6

76.6

No

6

12.8

89.4

Whatever is good for the healthcare intuition

5

10.6

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Question 12

Frequency Table

Should Consent be sorted?

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Yes

40

85.1

93.02

93.0

No

3

6.4

6.98

100.0

Total

43

91.5

100.0

 

Missing Response

4

8.5

 

 

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

A contingency table showing association between respondents’ willingness to sign a consent if consent are sorted

Consent Should be Sorted

Signing of Consent

Total

Yes

No

 

Yes

34

2

36

No

2

0

2

Whatever is good for the healthcare intuition

4

1

5

Total

40

3

43

 

 

 

 

Question 13

Frequency Table

Conceptions About Medical Record Storage

Frequency

Percent

Cumulative Percent

It Should be manually captured and stored in files

5

10.64

10.64

It should be electronically managed for easy retrieval and future use

42

89.36

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

Question 14

Frequency Table

Management of healthcare Information

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

To be managed by the healthcare provider

40

85.1

87.0

87.0

To be managed by an independent organization

6

12.8

13.0

100.0

Total

46

97.9

100.0

 

Missing Response

1

2.1

 

 

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question 16

Frequency Table

Management of healthcare Information

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

I would welcome the initiative

24

51.1

52.2

52.2

I will not welcome the initiative

8

17.0

17.4

69.6

I do not know the value of such integration

14

29.8

30.4

100.0

Total

46

97.9

100.0

 

Missing Response

1

2.1

 

 

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Question 17

Frequency Table

Disadvantages of integrating Health data

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

My autonomy might be compromised

6

12.8

13.3

13.3

I fear that the information can be used for identity theft

14

29.8

31.1

44.4

I fear that the information can be access by

7

14.9

15.6

60.0

Other people might find out confidential information about my health status

7

14.9

15.6

75.6

The system might have some security limitations

11

23.4

24.4

100.0

Total

45

95.7

100.0

 

Missing Response

2

4.3

 

 

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

Question 18

Frequencies Distribution of Reasons for Managing Healthcare Data Electronically

Reasons for Managing Healthcare Data Electronically

Responses

Percentage of cases

Counts

Percent

I do not support electronic management of my health data

6

5.0

13.0

For easy retrieval against my future visit to the hospital

27

22.3

58.7

For health insurance purposes

13

10.7

28.3

For cases of emergency where I cannot provide the data before treatment

21

17.4

45.7

Reduced time needed for collecting these details all the time

17

14.0

37.0

Easy access by the click of a button

14

11.6

30.4

Improved quality healthcare administration

23

19.0

50.0

Total

121

100.0

263.0

 

Graph Keys

a

I do not support electronic management of my health data

b

For easy retrieval against my future visit to the hospital

c

For health insurance purposes

d

For cases of emergency where I cannot provide the data before treatment

e

Reduced time needed for collecting these details all the time

f

Easy access by the click of a button

g

Improved quality healthcare administration

 

 

Question 19

Frequency Table

Reasons for Digital Medical Records

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

In case of medical emergency e.g. accidents

36

76.6

76.6

To save pre-admission administrative time

11

23.4

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Question 20

Frequencies Distribution of Ethical issues associated with linking medical records digitally

 

Ethical issues associated with linking medical records digitally

Responses

Percentage of cases

Counts

Percent

Possibility of third party access to confidential health data

24

23.8

51.1

Use of data without my consent

24

23.8

51.1

Use of the data for other non-health related purposes e.g. to medical aid scheme companies

20

19.8

42.6

I would not disclose all information if the data is going to be linked digitally

2

2.0

4.3

Leaking of medical information

17

16.8

36.2

Theft of medical information

14

13.9

29.8

Total

101

100.0

214.9

 

 

                                                                  Graph Keys

a

Possibility of third party access to confidential health data

b

Use of data without my consent

c

Use of the data for other non-health related purposes e.g. to medical aid scheme companies

d

I would not disclose all information if the data is going to be linked digitally

e

Leaking of medical information

f

Theft of medical information

 

 

Question 21

Frequency Table

Measures for information leak

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

The service providers should accept liability in case of any bridge

30

63.8

63.8

I should be contacted immediately to alert me of the information leak

16

34.0

97.9

I don’t need to be informed

1

2.1

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

Question 22

Frequency Table

Have knowledge of Security System of Cloud?

Counts

Percent

Cumulative Percent

I know about Cloud

30

63.8

63.8

I do not know about Cloud

17

36.2

100.0

Total

47

100.0

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Push command for NetWorker Client Upgrade

Factors Affecting Users’ Sense of Security and Trust in Integrating Electronic health record to the cloud

Basic Elastic Cloud Storage Troubleshooting Commands